From: Liran Alon <LIRAN.ALON@ORACLE.COM>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
idan.brown@ORACLE.COM,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@ORACLE.COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: pvclock: Handle first-time write to pvclock-page contains random junk
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 02:44:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A08EAEA.9060701@ORACLE.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+Czqoe7P3e74KZeeBpMJJgkiuAY0BX7WTsye3G7gwtXLYA@mail.gmail.com>
On 13/11/17 02:40, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2017-11-05 22:11 GMT+08:00 Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>:
>> When guest passes KVM it's pvclock-page GPA via WRMSR to
>> MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME / MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME_NEW, KVM don't initialize
>> pvclock-page to some start-values. It just requests a clock-update which
>
> KVM does, please refer to memset(hv_clock, 0, size) in kvmclock_init().
kvmclock_init() is the code that runs in KVM-guest. I was talking here
about the code that handles the WRMSR in KVM hypervisor code.
The issue happens when the guest doesn't init pvclock-page as done in
kvmclock_init(). Not all guests behave nicely :)
-Liran
>
> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li
>
>> will happen before entering to guest.
>>
>> The clock-update logic will call kvm_setup_pvclock_page() to update the
>> pvclock-page with info. However, kvm_setup_pvclock_page() *wrongly*
>> assumes that the version-field is initialized to an even number. This is
>> wrong because at first-time write, field could be any-value.
>>
>> Fix simply makes sure that if first-time version-field is odd, increment
>> it once more to make it even and only then start standard logic.
>> This follows same logic as done in other pvclock shared-pages (See
>> kvm_write_wall_clock() and record_steal_time()).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Nikita Leshenko <nikita.leshchenko@oracle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 03869eb7fcd6..181106080e41 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -1830,6 +1830,9 @@ static void kvm_setup_pvclock_page(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>> */
>> BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info, version) != 0);
>>
>> + if (guest_hv_clock.version & 1)
>> + ++guest_hv_clock.version; /* first time write, random junk */
>> +
>> vcpu->hv_clock.version = guest_hv_clock.version + 1;
>> kvm_write_guest_cached(v->kvm, &vcpu->pv_time,
>> &vcpu->hv_clock,
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-13 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-05 14:11 [PATCH] KVM: x86: pvclock: Handle first-time write to pvclock-page contains random junk Liran Alon
2017-11-06 9:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-10 21:36 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-11-13 0:40 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-11-13 0:44 ` Liran Alon [this message]
2017-11-13 0:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-11-13 0:55 ` Liran Alon
2017-11-13 1:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-11-13 1:37 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-11-13 5:53 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A08EAEA.9060701@ORACLE.COM \
--to=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=idan.brown@ORACLE.COM \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@ORACLE.COM \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox