From: Liran Alon <LIRAN.ALON@ORACLE.COM>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
idan.brown@ORACLE.COM,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@ORACLE.COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: pvclock: Handle first-time write to pvclock-page contains random junk
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 02:55:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A08ED7D.2020003@ORACLE.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+Cy9oaG-DU_0pYpvvcKoDTRPiar+HdG-rrEK9EnWn2-sKg@mail.gmail.com>
On 13/11/17 02:52, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2017-11-13 8:44 GMT+08:00 Liran Alon <LIRAN.ALON@oracle.com>:
>>
>>
>> On 13/11/17 02:40, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>
>>> 2017-11-05 22:11 GMT+08:00 Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>:
>>>>
>>>> When guest passes KVM it's pvclock-page GPA via WRMSR to
>>>> MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME / MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME_NEW, KVM don't initialize
>>>> pvclock-page to some start-values. It just requests a clock-update which
>>>
>>>
>>> KVM does, please refer to memset(hv_clock, 0, size) in kvmclock_init().
>>
>>
>> kvmclock_init() is the code that runs in KVM-guest. I was talking here about
>> the code that handles the WRMSR in KVM hypervisor code.
>>
>> The issue happens when the guest doesn't init pvclock-page as done in
>> kvmclock_init(). Not all guests behave nicely :)
>
> But the codes which you modify just works for kvm guest I think.
No, it's the code that runs in KVM hypervisor for any guest that knows
how to work with KVM pv-clock PV interface.
Linux guest is just one of the possible guests which can use this
interface. kvmclock_init() you mentioned is part of the linux-guest. But
there are other guests which use KVM pv-clock PV interface.
-Liran
>
> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li
>
>>
>> -Liran
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Wanpeng Li
>>>
>>>> will happen before entering to guest.
>>>>
>>>> The clock-update logic will call kvm_setup_pvclock_page() to update the
>>>> pvclock-page with info. However, kvm_setup_pvclock_page() *wrongly*
>>>> assumes that the version-field is initialized to an even number. This is
>>>> wrong because at first-time write, field could be any-value.
>>>>
>>>> Fix simply makes sure that if first-time version-field is odd, increment
>>>> it once more to make it even and only then start standard logic.
>>>> This follows same logic as done in other pvclock shared-pages (See
>>>> kvm_write_wall_clock() and record_steal_time()).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Nikita Leshenko <nikita.leshchenko@oracle.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> index 03869eb7fcd6..181106080e41 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> @@ -1830,6 +1830,9 @@ static void kvm_setup_pvclock_page(struct kvm_vcpu
>>>> *v)
>>>> */
>>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info, version) !=
>>>> 0);
>>>>
>>>> + if (guest_hv_clock.version & 1)
>>>> + ++guest_hv_clock.version; /* first time write, random
>>>> junk */
>>>> +
>>>> vcpu->hv_clock.version = guest_hv_clock.version + 1;
>>>> kvm_write_guest_cached(v->kvm, &vcpu->pv_time,
>>>> &vcpu->hv_clock,
>>>> --
>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-13 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-05 14:11 [PATCH] KVM: x86: pvclock: Handle first-time write to pvclock-page contains random junk Liran Alon
2017-11-06 9:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-10 21:36 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-11-13 0:40 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-11-13 0:44 ` Liran Alon
2017-11-13 0:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-11-13 0:55 ` Liran Alon [this message]
2017-11-13 1:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-11-13 1:37 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-11-13 5:53 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A08ED7D.2020003@ORACLE.COM \
--to=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=idan.brown@ORACLE.COM \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@ORACLE.COM \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox