kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, liliang.opensource@gmail.com,
	yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, quan.xu0@gmail.com, nilal@redhat.com,
	riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 2/3] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:44:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A616995.4050702@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117180337-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

On 01/18/2018 12:44 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:10:11PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
>

>
>> +{
>> +	struct scatterlist sg;
>> +	unsigned int unused;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	sg_init_one(&sg, addr, sizeof(uint32_t));
> This passes a guest-endian value to host. This is a problem:
> should always pass LE values.

I think the endianness is handled when virtqueue_add_outbuf():

desc[i].addr = cpu_to_virtio64(_vq->vdev, addr);

right?

>
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * This handles the cornercase that the vq happens to be full when
>> +	 * adding a cmd id. Rarely happen in practice.
>> +	 */
>> +	while (!vq->num_free)
>> +		virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &unused);
> I dislike this busy-waiting. It's a hint after all -
> why not just retry later - hopefully after getting an
> interrupt?
>
> Alternatively, stop adding more entries when we have a single
> ring entry left, making sure we have space for the command.

I think the second one looks good. Thanks.

>> +			queue_work(system_freezable_wq,
>> +				   &vb->update_balloon_size_work);
>> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vb->stop_update_lock, flags);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	virtio_cread(vb->vdev, struct virtio_balloon_config,
>> +		     free_page_report_cmd_id, &cmd_id);
> You want virtio_cread_feature, don't access the new field
> if the feature has not been negotiated.

Right. We probably need to put all the following cmd id related things 
under the feature check,

How about

if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ)) {
     virtio_cread(..);
     if (cmd_id == VIRTIO_BALLOON_FREE_PAGE_REPORT_STOP_ID) {
     ....
}


>
>
>> +	if (cmd_id == VIRTIO_BALLOON_FREE_PAGE_REPORT_STOP_ID) {
>> +		WRITE_ONCE(vb->report_free_page, false);
>> +	} else if (cmd_id != vb->start_cmd_id) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Host requests to start the reporting by sending a new cmd
>> +		 * id.
>> +		 */
>> +		WRITE_ONCE(vb->report_free_page, true);
> I don't know why we bother with WRITE_ONCE here.  The point of
> report_free_page being used lockless is that that it's not a big deal if
> it's wrong occasionally, right?

Actually the main reason is that "vb->report_free_page" is a value 
shared by two threads:
Written by the config_change here, and read by the worker thread that 
reports the free pages.

Alternatively, we could let the two sides access to the shared variable 
with "volatile" pointers.


>
>
>
>> +		vb->start_cmd_id = cmd_id;
>> +		queue_work(vb->balloon_wq, &vb->report_free_page_work);
> It seems that if a command was already queued (with a different id),
> this will result in new command id being sent to host twice, which will
> likely confuse the host.

I think that case won't happen, because
- the host sends a cmd id to the guest via the config, while the guest 
acks back the received cmd id via the virtqueue;
- the guest ack back a cmd id only when a new cmd id is received from 
the host, that is the above check:

     if (cmd_id != vb->start_cmd_id) { --> the driver only queues the 
reporting work only when a new cmd id is received
                         /*
                          * Host requests to start the reporting by 
sending a
                          * new cmd id.
                          */
                         WRITE_ONCE(vb->report_free_page, true);
                         vb->start_cmd_id = cmd_id;
                         queue_work(vb->balloon_wq, 
&vb->report_free_page_work);
     }

So the same cmd id wouldn't queue the reporting work twice.


>
>
>
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void update_balloon_size(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
>>   {
>>   	u32 actual = vb->num_pages;
>> @@ -417,40 +513,113 @@ static void update_balloon_size_func(struct work_struct *work)
>>   
>>   static int init_vqs(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
>>   {
>> -	struct virtqueue *vqs[3];
>> -	vq_callback_t *callbacks[] = { balloon_ack, balloon_ack, stats_request };
>> -	static const char * const names[] = { "inflate", "deflate", "stats" };
>> -	int err, nvqs;
>> +	struct virtqueue **vqs;
>> +	vq_callback_t **callbacks;
>> +	const char **names;
>> +	struct scatterlist sg;
>> +	int i, nvqs, err = -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	/* Inflateq and deflateq are used unconditionally */
>> +	nvqs = 2;
>> +	if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_STATS_VQ))
>> +		nvqs++;
>> +	if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ))
>> +		nvqs++;
>> +
>> +	/* Allocate space for find_vqs parameters */
>> +	vqs = kcalloc(nvqs, sizeof(*vqs), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!vqs)
>> +		goto err_vq;
>> +	callbacks = kmalloc_array(nvqs, sizeof(*callbacks), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!callbacks)
>> +		goto err_callback;
>> +	names = kmalloc_array(nvqs, sizeof(*names), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!names)
>> +		goto err_names;
> Why not just keep these 3 arrays on stack? they aren't large.

Sounds good. Here is the new implementation:

static int init_vqs(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
{
         struct virtqueue *vqs[4];
         vq_callback_t *callbacks[4];
         const char *names[4];
         struct scatterlist sg;
         int ret;


         /*
          * Inflateq and deflateq are used unconditionally. stats_vq and
          * free_page_vq uses names[2] and names[3], respectively. The 
names[]
          * will be NULL if the related feature is not enabled, which will
          * cause no allocation for the corresponding virtqueue in find_vqs.
          */
         callbacks[0] = balloon_ack;
         names[0] = "inflate";
         callbacks[1] = balloon_ack;
         names[1] = "deflate";
         names[2] = NULL;
         names[3] = NULL;

         if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_STATS_VQ)) {
                 names[2] = "stats";
                 callbacks[2] = stats_request;
         }
         if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ)) {
                 names[3] = "free_page_vq";
                 callbacks[3] = NULL;
         }

         ret = vb->vdev->config->find_vqs(vb->vdev, 4, vqs, callbacks, 
names,
                                          NULL, NULL);
         if (ret)
                 return ret;

         vb->inflate_vq = vqs[0];
         vb->deflate_vq = vqs[1];

         if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_STATS_VQ)) {
                 vb->stats_vq = vqs[2];
                 /*
                  * Prime this virtqueue with one buffer so the 
hypervisor can
                  * use it to signal us later (it can't be broken yet!).
                  */
                 sg_init_one(&sg, vb->stats, sizeof(vb->stats));
                 ret = virtqueue_add_outbuf(vb->stats_vq, &sg, 1, vb,
                                            GFP_KERNEL);
                 if (ret) {
                         dev_warn(&vb->vdev->dev, "%s: add stat_vq 
failed\n",
                                  __func__);
                         return ret;
                 }
                 virtqueue_kick(vb->stats_vq);
         }

         if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ))
                 vb->free_page_vq = vqs[3];

         return 0;
}


Btw, the QEMU side doesn't have an option to disable STATS_VQ currently, 
we may need to add that later.

Best,
Wei

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19  3:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-17  5:10 [PATCH v22 0/3] Virtio-balloon: support free page reporting Wei Wang
2018-01-17  5:10 ` [PATCH v22 1/3] mm: support reporting free page blocks Wei Wang
2018-01-17  5:10 ` [PATCH v22 2/3] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ Wei Wang
2018-01-17  8:21   ` Pankaj Gupta
2018-01-17  9:00     ` Wei Wang
2018-01-17  9:27       ` Pankaj Gupta
2018-01-17 10:47         ` Wei Wang
2018-01-17 16:44   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-18 13:30     ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-18 19:09       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-18 21:11         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-18 22:32           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-20 14:23             ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-19  3:44     ` Wei Wang [this message]
2018-01-19 12:39       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-22 11:25         ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2018-01-24  3:18           ` Wei Wang
2018-01-24  4:31             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-24  4:29           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-24 11:28             ` Wei Wang
2018-01-19  6:24     ` Wei Wang
2018-01-17  5:10 ` [PATCH v22 3/3] virtio-balloon: don't report free pages when page poisoning is enabled Wei Wang
2018-01-18 22:37   ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5A616995.4050702@intel.com \
    --to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liliang.opensource@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nilal@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=quan.xu0@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).