From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, liliang.opensource@gmail.com,
yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, quan.xu0@gmail.com, nilal@redhat.com,
riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 2/3] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:44:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A616995.4050702@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117180337-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 01/18/2018 12:44 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:10:11PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
>
>
>> +{
>> + struct scatterlist sg;
>> + unsigned int unused;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + sg_init_one(&sg, addr, sizeof(uint32_t));
> This passes a guest-endian value to host. This is a problem:
> should always pass LE values.
I think the endianness is handled when virtqueue_add_outbuf():
desc[i].addr = cpu_to_virtio64(_vq->vdev, addr);
right?
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * This handles the cornercase that the vq happens to be full when
>> + * adding a cmd id. Rarely happen in practice.
>> + */
>> + while (!vq->num_free)
>> + virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &unused);
> I dislike this busy-waiting. It's a hint after all -
> why not just retry later - hopefully after getting an
> interrupt?
>
> Alternatively, stop adding more entries when we have a single
> ring entry left, making sure we have space for the command.
I think the second one looks good. Thanks.
>> + queue_work(system_freezable_wq,
>> + &vb->update_balloon_size_work);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vb->stop_update_lock, flags);
>> + }
>> +
>> + virtio_cread(vb->vdev, struct virtio_balloon_config,
>> + free_page_report_cmd_id, &cmd_id);
> You want virtio_cread_feature, don't access the new field
> if the feature has not been negotiated.
Right. We probably need to put all the following cmd id related things
under the feature check,
How about
if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ)) {
virtio_cread(..);
if (cmd_id == VIRTIO_BALLOON_FREE_PAGE_REPORT_STOP_ID) {
....
}
>
>
>> + if (cmd_id == VIRTIO_BALLOON_FREE_PAGE_REPORT_STOP_ID) {
>> + WRITE_ONCE(vb->report_free_page, false);
>> + } else if (cmd_id != vb->start_cmd_id) {
>> + /*
>> + * Host requests to start the reporting by sending a new cmd
>> + * id.
>> + */
>> + WRITE_ONCE(vb->report_free_page, true);
> I don't know why we bother with WRITE_ONCE here. The point of
> report_free_page being used lockless is that that it's not a big deal if
> it's wrong occasionally, right?
Actually the main reason is that "vb->report_free_page" is a value
shared by two threads:
Written by the config_change here, and read by the worker thread that
reports the free pages.
Alternatively, we could let the two sides access to the shared variable
with "volatile" pointers.
>
>
>
>> + vb->start_cmd_id = cmd_id;
>> + queue_work(vb->balloon_wq, &vb->report_free_page_work);
> It seems that if a command was already queued (with a different id),
> this will result in new command id being sent to host twice, which will
> likely confuse the host.
I think that case won't happen, because
- the host sends a cmd id to the guest via the config, while the guest
acks back the received cmd id via the virtqueue;
- the guest ack back a cmd id only when a new cmd id is received from
the host, that is the above check:
if (cmd_id != vb->start_cmd_id) { --> the driver only queues the
reporting work only when a new cmd id is received
/*
* Host requests to start the reporting by
sending a
* new cmd id.
*/
WRITE_ONCE(vb->report_free_page, true);
vb->start_cmd_id = cmd_id;
queue_work(vb->balloon_wq,
&vb->report_free_page_work);
}
So the same cmd id wouldn't queue the reporting work twice.
>
>
>
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static void update_balloon_size(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
>> {
>> u32 actual = vb->num_pages;
>> @@ -417,40 +513,113 @@ static void update_balloon_size_func(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>> static int init_vqs(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
>> {
>> - struct virtqueue *vqs[3];
>> - vq_callback_t *callbacks[] = { balloon_ack, balloon_ack, stats_request };
>> - static const char * const names[] = { "inflate", "deflate", "stats" };
>> - int err, nvqs;
>> + struct virtqueue **vqs;
>> + vq_callback_t **callbacks;
>> + const char **names;
>> + struct scatterlist sg;
>> + int i, nvqs, err = -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* Inflateq and deflateq are used unconditionally */
>> + nvqs = 2;
>> + if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_STATS_VQ))
>> + nvqs++;
>> + if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ))
>> + nvqs++;
>> +
>> + /* Allocate space for find_vqs parameters */
>> + vqs = kcalloc(nvqs, sizeof(*vqs), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!vqs)
>> + goto err_vq;
>> + callbacks = kmalloc_array(nvqs, sizeof(*callbacks), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!callbacks)
>> + goto err_callback;
>> + names = kmalloc_array(nvqs, sizeof(*names), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!names)
>> + goto err_names;
> Why not just keep these 3 arrays on stack? they aren't large.
Sounds good. Here is the new implementation:
static int init_vqs(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
{
struct virtqueue *vqs[4];
vq_callback_t *callbacks[4];
const char *names[4];
struct scatterlist sg;
int ret;
/*
* Inflateq and deflateq are used unconditionally. stats_vq and
* free_page_vq uses names[2] and names[3], respectively. The
names[]
* will be NULL if the related feature is not enabled, which will
* cause no allocation for the corresponding virtqueue in find_vqs.
*/
callbacks[0] = balloon_ack;
names[0] = "inflate";
callbacks[1] = balloon_ack;
names[1] = "deflate";
names[2] = NULL;
names[3] = NULL;
if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_STATS_VQ)) {
names[2] = "stats";
callbacks[2] = stats_request;
}
if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ)) {
names[3] = "free_page_vq";
callbacks[3] = NULL;
}
ret = vb->vdev->config->find_vqs(vb->vdev, 4, vqs, callbacks,
names,
NULL, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
vb->inflate_vq = vqs[0];
vb->deflate_vq = vqs[1];
if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_STATS_VQ)) {
vb->stats_vq = vqs[2];
/*
* Prime this virtqueue with one buffer so the
hypervisor can
* use it to signal us later (it can't be broken yet!).
*/
sg_init_one(&sg, vb->stats, sizeof(vb->stats));
ret = virtqueue_add_outbuf(vb->stats_vq, &sg, 1, vb,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret) {
dev_warn(&vb->vdev->dev, "%s: add stat_vq
failed\n",
__func__);
return ret;
}
virtqueue_kick(vb->stats_vq);
}
if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ))
vb->free_page_vq = vqs[3];
return 0;
}
Btw, the QEMU side doesn't have an option to disable STATS_VQ currently,
we may need to add that later.
Best,
Wei
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-19 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 5:10 [PATCH v22 0/3] Virtio-balloon: support free page reporting Wei Wang
2018-01-17 5:10 ` [PATCH v22 1/3] mm: support reporting free page blocks Wei Wang
2018-01-17 5:10 ` [PATCH v22 2/3] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ Wei Wang
2018-01-17 8:21 ` Pankaj Gupta
2018-01-17 9:00 ` Wei Wang
2018-01-17 9:27 ` Pankaj Gupta
2018-01-17 10:47 ` Wei Wang
2018-01-17 16:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-18 13:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-18 19:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-18 21:11 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-18 22:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-20 14:23 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-19 3:44 ` Wei Wang [this message]
2018-01-19 12:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-22 11:25 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2018-01-24 3:18 ` Wei Wang
2018-01-24 4:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-24 4:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-24 11:28 ` Wei Wang
2018-01-19 6:24 ` Wei Wang
2018-01-17 5:10 ` [PATCH v22 3/3] virtio-balloon: don't report free pages when page poisoning is enabled Wei Wang
2018-01-18 22:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A616995.4050702@intel.com \
--to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liliang.opensource@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nilal@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=quan.xu0@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).