From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jiangyiwen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] VSOCK: support fill data to mergeable rx buffer in host Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:56:26 +0800 Message-ID: <5BE397CA.5060000@huawei.com> References: <5BDFF537.3050806@huawei.com> <485c2c5d-d73e-e679-9549-aad3de02f0ab@redhat.com> <5BE134EF.1070009@huawei.com> <8963dba5-c2fb-69d0-4adb-72d751a9dedf@redhat.com> <5BE2903C.50608@huawei.com> <76732898-8e4f-910a-aac5-ea4b635a1c15@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: , , To: Jason Wang , , Return-path: In-Reply-To: <76732898-8e4f-910a-aac5-ea4b635a1c15@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 2018/11/7 21:32, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/7 下午3:11, jiangyiwen wrote: >> On 2018/11/7 14:18, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2018/11/6 下午2:30, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>>> Seems duplicated with the one used by vhost-net. >>>>> >>>>> In packed virtqueue implementation, I plan to move this to vhost.c. >>>>> >>>> Yes, this code is full copied from vhost-net, if it can be packed into >>>> vhost.c, it would be great. >>>> >>> If you try to reuse vhost-net, you don't even need to care about this:) >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> . >>> >> Hi Jason, >> >> Thank your advice, I will consider your idea. But I don't know >> what's stefan's suggestion? It seems that he doesn't care much >> about this community.:( > > > I think not. He is probably busy these days. > > >> >> I still hope this community can have some vitality. >> > > Let's wait for few more days for the possible comments from Stefan or Michael. But I do prefer to unify the virtio networking datapath which will be easier to be extended and maintained. > > Thanks > > > . > Hi Jason, Actually vsock use virtio-net as transport path should be a better idea, I will try to consider the new idea. Thanks, Yiwen.