kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, like.xu@intel.com,
	jannh@google.com, arei.gonglei@huawei.com, jmattson@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/12] KVM/x86/vPMU: Add APIs to support host save/restore the guest lbr stack
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:19:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D259F92.6030107@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190709121912.GY3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 07/09/2019 08:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> For the lbr feature, could we thought of it as first come, first served?
>> For example, if we have 2 host threads who want to use lbr at the same time,
>> I think one of them would simply fail to use.
>>
>> So if guest first gets the lbr, host wouldn't take over unless some
>> userspace command (we added to QEMU) is executed to have the vCPU
>> actively stop using lbr.
> Doesn't work that way.
>
> Say you start KVM with LBR emulation, it creates this task event, it
> gets the LBR (nobody else wants it) and the guest works and starts using
> the LBR.
>
> Then the host creates a CPU LBR event and the vCPU suddenly gets denied
> the LBR and the guest no longer functions correctly.
>
> Or you should fail to VMENTER, in which case you starve the guest, but
> at least it doesn't malfunction.
>

Ok, I think we could go with the first option for now, like this:

When there are other host threads starting to use lbr, host perf notifies
kvm to disable the guest use of lbr (add a notifier_block), which includes:
  - cancel passing through lbr msrs to guest
  - upon guest access to the lbr msr (will trap to KVM now), return #GP
    (or 0).


Best,
Wei




  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-10  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08  1:23 [PATCH v7 00/12] Guest LBR Enabling Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] perf/x86: fix the variable type of the LBR MSRs Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] perf/x86: add a function to get the lbr stack Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] KVM/x86: KVM_CAP_X86_GUEST_LBR Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] KVM/x86: intel_pmu_lbr_enable Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] KVM/x86/vPMU: tweak kvm_pmu_get_msr Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] KVM/x86: expose MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES to the guest Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] perf/x86: no counter allocation support Wei Wang
2019-07-08 14:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09  2:58     ` Wei Wang
2019-07-09  9:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09 11:36         ` Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] KVM/x86/vPMU: Add APIs to support host save/restore the guest lbr stack Wei Wang
2019-07-08 14:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09  3:04     ` Wei Wang
2019-07-09  9:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09 11:34         ` Wei Wang
2019-07-09 12:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-10  8:19             ` Wei Wang [this message]
2019-07-09 11:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-10  8:21     ` Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] perf/x86: save/restore LBR_SELECT on vCPU switching Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] KVM/x86/lbr: lazy save the guest lbr stack Wei Wang
2019-07-08 14:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-08 15:11     ` Andi Kleen
2019-07-09 11:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09  3:14     ` Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] KVM/x86: remove the common handling of the debugctl msr Wei Wang
2019-07-08  1:23 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] KVM/VMX/vPMU: support to report GLOBAL_STATUS_LBRS_FROZEN Wei Wang
2019-07-08 15:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09  3:24     ` Wei Wang
2019-07-09 11:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-10  9:23         ` Wei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5D259F92.6030107@intel.com \
    --to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).