From: Robert Hoo <robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: x86: Do not unload MMU roots when only toggling CR0.WP with TDP enabled
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 09:04:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5aec4689-fe63-abff-94d4-8e42cf5bba66@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0d4b430-afd2-979c-e7d2-b53e131412ad@grsecurity.net>
On 5/8/2023 5:30 PM, Mathias Krause wrote:
>>> void kvm_post_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long old_cr0,
>>> unsigned long cr0)
>>> {
>>> + /*
>>> + * CR0.WP is incorporated into the MMU role, but only for
>>> non-nested,
>>> + * indirect shadow MMUs. If TDP is enabled, the MMU's metadata
>>> needs
>>> + * to be updated, e.g. so that emulating guest translations does the
>>> + * right thing, but there's no need to unload the root as CR0.WP
>>> + * doesn't affect SPTEs.
>>> + */
>>> + if (tdp_enabled && (cr0 ^ old_cr0) == X86_CR0_WP) {
>>
>> Curiously, this patch only affects tdp_enabled, why does legacy MMU also
>> see comparable performance gains?
>
> Because 'tdp_enabled' just implies EPT / NPT and only 'tdp_mmu_enabled'
> decides which MMU mode to use -- either legacy or TDP MMU (see
> kvm_configure_mmu() and now gets invoked from vmx.c / svm.c).
>
Ah, get it, thanks. The name indeed confuses me (and perhaps others).
After dig into,
1. kvm modules has a param "tdp_mmu_enabled", (in the first place)
indicates KVM level's willingness on enable two dimensional paging.
However, it in the end depends on ept/npt enabled or not on vendor layer.
So, uses a "tdp_mmu_allowed" to intermediately record this willness in kvm
module init phase.
/*
* Snapshot userspace's desire to enable the TDP MMU. Whether or not the
* TDP MMU is actually enabled is determined in kvm_configure_mmu()
* when the vendor module is loaded.
*/
tdp_mmu_allowed = tdp_mmu_enabled;
2. When vendor module init --> kvm_configure_mmu()
tdp_mmu_enabled = tdp_mmu_allowed && tdp_enabled;
tdp_mmu_enabled's semantics becomes, as its name indicates, the
eventual tdp mmu enablement status.
And, tdp_enabled, is the general (ept_enabled | npt_enabled).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-09 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-22 1:37 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: MMU: performance tweaks for heavy CR0.WP users Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Avoid indirect call for get_cr3 Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: x86: Do not unload MMU roots when only toggling CR0.WP with TDP enabled Mathias Krause
2023-05-07 7:32 ` Robert Hoo
2023-05-08 9:30 ` Mathias Krause
2023-05-09 1:04 ` Robert Hoo [this message]
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: x86: Ignore CR0.WP toggles in non-paging mode Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: x86: Make use of kvm_read_cr*_bits() when testing bits Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix comment typo Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit Mathias Krause
2023-03-27 8:33 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-03-27 8:37 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-27 13:48 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-03-30 8:45 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-30 17:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-30 20:15 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-30 20:30 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-30 20:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-30 20:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-30 20:55 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-31 14:18 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 7:41 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: MMU: performance tweaks for heavy CR0.WP users Mathias Krause
2023-03-23 22:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-25 11:39 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-25 12:25 ` Greg KH
2023-04-06 2:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-06 13:22 ` Mathias Krause
2023-04-14 9:29 ` Mathias Krause
2023-04-14 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-14 20:09 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-04-14 20:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-02 17:38 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-05-08 9:19 ` Mathias Krause
2023-05-08 15:57 ` Mathias Krause
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5aec4689-fe63-abff-94d4-8e42cf5bba66@gmail.com \
--to=robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@grsecurity.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox