From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-188.mta0.migadu.com (out-188.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD4EBE49 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.188 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707784840; cv=none; b=YGA0KfEVEySQDdu4Q6cf1jQn0HzI2YfFKC6qAmix5qVJ3WZyXxU2peEt/euwEb8acYawoLHGnkt+246UfGNCMVHJEeLcBCI5VRrzIsG9m1MB/O+c/146WGiRsdfmcxOZKymFaWvprnlRbbDDQTeTaAUWyZ1MHcdbdCUj/pe4fkA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707784840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aX0NGQtSQ1xOstbOgtF2F5o9CPGIRMm4cz8XxG3lAok=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kh9zAROjtJPRXhcISaGEGlNZU8YchtTueoLZV2jWg8VchzwG/Bp9cYbG8shdHhlLBTJ02fREzUZKwKRSn5jyRCcMBApMa3nQka2O4iOsU8EaEesk2DnUNY81ti06hx6Dgy6bhVkS1/GIcWyPmlCNYSyzBc636OA/t0SvrJJsmJ0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=wGH21jOa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="wGH21jOa" Message-ID: <5c7d908b-5bc1-ce0d-6443-545eced3a0ec@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1707784834; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r413WKpLLWVqOcLrWckL+PNTc7epKr5Ir5tZXNeWWGU=; b=wGH21jOaJ20VcTOw06Zs+ZVaNr26HquiaHNbWicq79AGbGdB4XjcpLyxnsSgSG+s4NvjZl E5wGp8sIm8GqbAlFojP2BaOy12bCOIFHaBtZCYLUbgyHv2j8wG74CzKA1BsejeRcgpRSUC A8XqzzPslueRaC8LW7/08YUN3a03PwE= Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 08:39:56 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Print timer ctl register in ISTATUS assertion Content-Language: en-US To: Oliver Upton , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Raghavendra Rao Ananta , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240212210932.3095265-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Zenghui Yu In-Reply-To: <20240212210932.3095265-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 2024/2/13 05:09, Oliver Upton wrote: > Zenghui noted that the test assertion for the ISTATUS bit is printing > the current timer value instead of the control register in the case of > failure. While the assertion is sound, printing CNT isn't informative. > > Change things around to actually print the CTL register value instead. > > Reported-by: Zenghui Yu > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/3188e6f1-f150-f7d0-6c2b-5b7608b0b012@huawei.com/ > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu