From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: Move to GPL 2 and SPDX license identifiers
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:19:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d484586-b984-4b7a-1b50-e6f3314645dc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0e8582e-8734-739b-d279-1e8004f379a3@redhat.com>
On 09.12.20 10:12, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 08.12.20 16:09, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> In the past we had some issues when developers wanted to use code
>> snippets or constants from the kernel in a test or in the library. To
>> remedy that the s390x maintainers decided to move all files to GPL
>> 2 (if possible).
>>
>> At the same time let's move to SPDX identifiers as they are much nicer
>> to read.
>>
>
> If I am not wrong, your patch only replaces existing license text by
> SPDX identifiers. So I find this commit message rather confusing. The
> "at the same time" is actually the only thing that is being done - or am
> I missing something important?
>
> I wonder of we can just convert everything to GPL-2.0-or-later, the list
> of people that contributed to most files is rather limited, so getting
> most acks should be easy.
>
Aehm, I missed the "Library" part :D
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-09 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-08 15:09 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Move from LGPL 2 to GPL 2 Janosch Frank
2020-12-08 15:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: Move to GPL 2 and SPDX license identifiers Janosch Frank
2020-12-08 15:14 ` Thomas Huth
2020-12-09 9:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-12-09 9:19 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-12-09 9:49 ` Janosch Frank
2020-12-09 11:01 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-12-09 12:43 ` Pierre Morel
2020-12-08 15:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: lib: " Janosch Frank
2020-12-08 15:21 ` Thomas Huth
2020-12-09 9:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-12-09 9:46 ` Janosch Frank
2020-12-10 16:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-12-10 16:20 ` Janosch Frank
2020-12-09 11:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-12-09 12:50 ` Pierre Morel
2020-12-09 9:01 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Move from LGPL 2 to GPL 2 Christian Borntraeger
2020-12-09 10:16 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-12-09 16:07 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d484586-b984-4b7a-1b50-e6f3314645dc@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox