From: Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com>,
Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Streamline uc_skey test to issue iske after sske
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 16:09:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60a4ca396110a955488270767749852e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241216092140.329196-6-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
On 2024-12-16 10:21, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> In some rare situations a non default storage key is already set on the
> memory used by the test. Within normal VMs the key is reset / zapped
> when the memory is added to the VM. This is not the case for ucontrol
> VMs. With the initial iske check removed this test case can work in all
> situations. The function of the iske instruction is still validated by
> the remaining code.
>
> Fixes: 7d900f8ac191 ("selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_skey VM test case")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 22 +++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> index 8f306395696e..ef3e391811b3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> @@ -88,10 +88,6 @@ asm("test_skey_asm:\n"
> " ahi %r0,1\n"
> " st %r1,0(%r5,%r6)\n"
>
> - " iske %r1,%r6\n"
> - " ahi %r0,1\n"
> - " diag 0,0,0x44\n"
> -
> " sske %r1,%r6\n"
> " xgr %r1,%r1\n"
> " iske %r1,%r6\n"
> @@ -593,7 +589,9 @@ TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_skey)
> ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));
> ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
>
> - /* ISKE */
> + /* SSKE + ISKE */
> + sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
> + run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
> ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
>
> /*
> @@ -607,19 +605,9 @@ TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_skey)
> TEST_ASSERT_EQ(ICPT_INST, sie_block->icptcode);
> TEST_REQUIRE(sie_block->ipa != 0xb229);
>
> - /* ISKE contd. */
> + /* SSKE + ISKE contd. */
> ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
> ASSERT_EQ(2, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> - /* assert initial skey (ACC = 0, R & C = 1) */
> - ASSERT_EQ(0x06, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
> - uc_assert_diag44(self);
> -
> - /* SSKE + ISKE */
> - sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
> - run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
> - ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
> - ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
> - ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> ASSERT_EQ(skeyvalue, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
> uc_assert_diag44(self);
>
> @@ -628,7 +616,7 @@ TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_skey)
> run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
> ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
> ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
> - ASSERT_EQ(4, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> + ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> /* assert R reset but rest of skey unchanged */
> ASSERT_EQ(skeyvalue & 0xfa, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
> ASSERT_EQ(0, sync_regs->gprs[1] & 0x04);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-16 9:21 [PATCH v2 0/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Reject invalid ioctls on ucontrol VMs Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] kvm: s390: Reject setting flic pfault attributes " Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-19 10:03 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol flic attr selftests Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-18 15:07 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-19 15:52 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] kvm: s390: Reject KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING on ucontrol VMs Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-18 15:08 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-19 15:53 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol gis routing test Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-18 15:08 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-19 15:54 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Streamline uc_skey test to issue iske after sske Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-18 15:09 ` Hariharan Mari [this message]
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Add has device attr check to uc_attr_mem_limit selftest Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-18 15:09 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Reject invalid ioctls on ucontrol VMs Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60a4ca396110a955488270767749852e@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hari55@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox