Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] KVM: s390: Use ESCA instead of BSCA at VM init
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 15:53:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <618a014d-5deb-4d66-b2d9-cea930f8f050@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250603-rm-bsca-v5-1-f691288ada5c@linux.ibm.com>

On 6/3/25 6:35 PM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> All modern IBM Z and Linux One machines do offer support for the
> Extended System Control Area (ESCA). The ESCA is available since the
> z114/z196 released in 2010.
> KVM needs to allocate and manage the SCA for guest VMs. Prior to this
> change the SCA was setup as Basic SCA only supporting a maximum of 64
> vCPUs when initializing the VM. With addition of the 65th vCPU the SCA
> was needed to be converted to a ESCA.
> 
> Instead of allocating a BSCA and upgrading it for PV or when adding the
> 65th cpu we can always allocate the ESCA directly upon VM creation
> simplifying the code in multiple places as well as completely removing
> the need to convert an existing SCA.
> 
> In cases where the ESCA is not supported (z10 and earlier) the use of
> the SCA entries and with that SIGP interpretation are disabled for VMs.
> This increases the number of exits from the VM in multiprocessor
> scenarios and thus decreases performance.
> The same is true for VSIE where SIGP is currently disabled and thus no
> SCA entries are used.
> 
> The only downside of the change is that we will always allocate 4 pages
> for a 248 cpu ESCA instead of a single page for the BSCA per VM.
> In return we can delete a bunch of checks and special handling depending
> on the SCA type as well as the whole BSCA to ESCA conversion.
> 
> With that behavior change we are no longer referencing a bsca_block in
> kvm->arch.sca. This will always be esca_block instead.
> By specifying the type of the sca as esca_block we can simplify access
> to the sca and get rid of some helpers while making the code clearer.
> 
> KVM_MAX_VCPUS is also moved to kvm_host_types to allow using this in
> future type definitions.
> 

Thanks for taking care of this, it makes the code a lot nicer to read.

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-04 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-03 16:35 [PATCH v5] KVM: s390: Use ESCA instead of BSCA at VM init Christoph Schlameuss
2025-06-04 13:53 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2025-06-04 14:31 ` Claudio Imbrenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=618a014d-5deb-4d66-b2d9-cea930f8f050@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox