public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/vfio-ap: fix circular lockdep when setting/clearing crypto masks
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 15:34:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e2842e4-334d-6592-a781-5b85ec0ed13c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210210115334.46635966.cohuck@redhat.com>



On 2/10/21 5:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue,  9 Feb 2021 14:48:30 -0500
> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch fixes a circular locking dependency in the CI introduced by
>> commit f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM
>> pointer invalidated"). The lockdep only occurs when starting a Secure
>> Execution guest. Crypto virtualization (vfio_ap) is not yet supported for
>> SE guests; however, in order to avoid CI errors, this fix is being
>> provided.
>>
>> The circular lockdep was introduced when the masks in the guest's APCB
>> were taken under the matrix_dev->lock. While the lock is definitely
>> needed to protect the setting/unsetting of the KVM pointer, it is not
>> necessarily critical for setting the masks, so this will not be done under
>> protection of the matrix_dev->lock.
>>
>> Fixes: f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM pointer invalidated")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>>   static void vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
>>   {
>> -	kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
>> -	matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
>> -	vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev->mdev);
>> -	kvm_put_kvm(matrix_mdev->kvm);
>> -	matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL;
>> +	if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
> If you're doing setting/unsetting under matrix_dev->lock, is it
> possible that matrix_mdev->kvm gets unset between here and the next
> line, as you don't hold the lock?

That is highly unlikely because the only place the matrix_mdev->kvm
pointer is cleared is in this function which is called from only two
places: the notifier that handles the VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM
notification when the KVM pointer is cleared; the vfio_ap_mdev_release()
function which is called when the mdev fd is closed (i.e., when the guest
is shut down). The fact is, with the only end-to-end implementation
currently available, the notifier callback is never invoked to clear
the KVM pointer because the vfio_ap_mdev_release callback is
invoked first and it unregisters the notifier callback.

Having said that, I suppose there is no guarantee that there will not
be different userspace clients in the future that do things in a
different order. At the very least, it wouldn't hurt to protect against
that as you suggest below.

>
> Maybe you could
> - grab a reference to kvm while holding the lock
> - call the mask handling functions with that kvm reference
> - lock again, drop the reference, and do the rest of the processing?
>
>> +		kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
>> +		mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>> +		matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
>> +		vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev->mdev);
>> +		kvm_put_kvm(matrix_mdev->kvm);
>> +		matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL;
>> +		mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>> +	}
>>   }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-10 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-09 19:48 [PATCH 0/1] fix circular lockdep when staring SE guest Tony Krowiak
2021-02-09 19:48 ` [PATCH 1/1] s390/vfio-ap: fix circular lockdep when setting/clearing crypto masks Tony Krowiak
2021-02-10 10:53   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-10 15:24     ` Halil Pasic
2021-02-10 15:32       ` Halil Pasic
2021-02-10 22:05         ` Tony Krowiak
2021-02-10 22:46           ` Halil Pasic
2021-02-11 14:21             ` Tony Krowiak
2021-02-11 16:47               ` Halil Pasic
2021-02-11 19:18                 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-02-10 22:03       ` Tony Krowiak
2021-02-10 20:34     ` Tony Krowiak [this message]
2021-02-11 12:23       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-11 14:38         ` Tony Krowiak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e2842e4-334d-6592-a781-5b85ec0ed13c@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox