public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	"farman@linux.ibm.com" <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	"pmorel@linux.ibm.com" <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
	"borntraeger@linux.ibm.com" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	"frankja@linux.ibm.com" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	"imbrenda@linux.ibm.com" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
	"akrowiak@linux.ibm.com" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	"jjherne@linux.ibm.com" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	"pasic@linux.ibm.com" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	"zhenyuw@linux.intel.com" <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>, "Christopherson, ,
	Sean" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" 
	<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/vfio: Fix potential deadlock on vfio group_lock
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:45:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6eff63d8-d825-aecd-12b5-e8dbf55f4372@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR11MB7529B08476DF1764F1B6C007C3C59@DS0PR11MB7529.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On 1/20/23 10:08 AM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
>> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2023 11:05 PM
>>
>> Currently it is possible that the final put of a KVM reference comes from
>> vfio during its device close operation.  This occurs while the vfio group
>> lock is held; however, if the vfio device is still in the kvm device list,
>> then the following call chain could result in a deadlock:
>>
>> VFIO holds group->group_lock/group_rwsem
>>   -> kvm_put_kvm
>>    -> kvm_destroy_vm
>>     -> kvm_destroy_devices
>>      -> kvm_vfio_destroy
>>       -> kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm
>>        -> vfio_file_set_kvm
>>         -> try to hold group->group_lock/group_rwsem
>>
>> The key function is the kvm_destroy_devices() which triggers destroy cb
>> of kvm_device_ops. It calls back to vfio and try to hold group_lock. So
>> if this path doesn't call back to vfio, this dead lock would be fixed.
>> Actually, there is a way for it. KVM provides another point to free the
>> kvm-vfio device which is the point when the device file descriptor is
>> closed. This can be achieved by providing the release cb instead of the
>> destroy cb. Also rename kvm_vfio_destroy() to be kvm_vfio_release().
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * Destroy is responsible for freeing dev.
>> 	 *
>> 	 * Destroy may be called before or after destructors are called
>> 	 * on emulated I/O regions, depending on whether a reference is
>> 	 * held by a vcpu or other kvm component that gets destroyed
>> 	 * after the emulated I/O.
>> 	 */
>> 	void (*destroy)(struct kvm_device *dev);
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * Release is an alternative method to free the device. It is
>> 	 * called when the device file descriptor is closed. Once
>> 	 * release is called, the destroy method will not be called
>> 	 * anymore as the device is removed from the device list of
>> 	 * the VM. kvm->lock is held.
>> 	 */
>> 	void (*release)(struct kvm_device *dev);
>>
>> Fixes: 421cfe6596f6 ("vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM")
>> Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>> Suggested-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> 
> More background can be found in Mathew's work.
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230114000351.115444-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com/T/#u
> 

Thanks Yi.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>

One small nit:  There is a comment at the very end of kvm_vfio_release on the kfree(dev) that still references .destroy, this should be updated to .release




  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-20 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-20 15:05 [PATCH] kvm/vfio: Fix potential deadlock on vfio group_lock Yi Liu
2023-01-20 15:08 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-01-20 15:45   ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2023-01-20 15:49     ` Alex Williamson
2023-01-20 17:58 ` Alex Williamson
2023-01-31 14:27 ` Anthony Krowiak
2023-01-31 14:34   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-31 14:46     ` Anthony Krowiak
2023-01-31 14:48       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-31 15:00         ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-31 15:12           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-31 14:35   ` Matthew Rosato

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6eff63d8-d825-aecd-12b5-e8dbf55f4372@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox