From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kvm: Clear paravirt_enabled on KVM guests for
 espfix32's benefit
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:05:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <712306212.21094370.1418245524447.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
References: <f4a06ce6a59616fe27be6f2aade468b76fad7904.1417834933.git.luto@amacapital.net> <5488334B.60805@redhat.com> <CALCETrV9PbQSntxWz29TfuzFnGn_yWhhRbEQkgm-KHMDJEtr8g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:55219 "EHLO
	mx3-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932527AbaLJVFa (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:05:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrV9PbQSntxWz29TfuzFnGn_yWhhRbEQkgm-KHMDJEtr8g@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

> In the interest of reduced future confusion, would it make sense to
> drop the duplicate initialization for 3.20?

Yup.  It would be great if possible to even unify the two init
functions, but I haven't checked what happens in the middle.

Paolo