Re: [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 02/11] x86: pmu: Enlarge cnt[] length to 64 in check_counters_many()

["Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>]

On 3/26/2024 5:41 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 7:09 PM Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Considering there are already 8 GP counters and 4 fixed counters on
>> latest Intel processors, like Sapphire Rapids. The original cnt[] array
>> length 10 is definitely not enough to cover all supported PMU counters on these
>> new processors even through currently KVM only supports 3 fixed counters
>> at most. This would cause out of bound memory access and may trigger
>> false alarm on PMU counter validation
>>
>> It's probably more and more GP and fixed counters are introduced in the
>> future and then directly extends the cnt[] array length to 64 once and
>> for all.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   x86/pmu.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
>> index 0def28695c70..a13b8a8398c6 100644
>> --- a/x86/pmu.c
>> +++ b/x86/pmu.c
>> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static void check_fixed_counters(void)
>>
>>   static void check_counters_many(void)
>>   {
>> -       pmu_counter_t cnt[10];
>> +       pmu_counter_t cnt[64];
> I think 48 should be sufficient, based on the layout of
> IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL and IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS.
>
> In any event, let's bump this up!
>
> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>

Yeah, would shrink to 48.

Thanks Jim. I'm glad you have time to review this patchset. Not sure if 
you have time to review other patches?