From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
michael.roth@amd.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, farrah.chen@intel.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386/kvm: Set return value after handling KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:46:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <745b2b6e-7dd0-4437-bbbf-673ddc0df014@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b8f7d63-ef0a-487f-bf9d-44421691fa85@redhat.com>
On 12/13/2024 5:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/12/24 20:13, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 12/12/24 09:07, Zhao Liu wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 11:26:28AM +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
>>>>> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:26:28 +0800
>>>>> From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] i386/kvm: Set return value after handling
>>>>> KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL
>>>>> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Userspace should set the ret field of hypercall after handling
>>>>> KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL. Otherwise, a stale value could be returned to KVM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 47e76d03b15 ("i386/kvm: Add KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL handling for KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE")
>>>>> Reported-by: Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
>>>>> Tested-by: Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> To test the TDX code in kvm-coco-queue, please apply the patch to the QEMU,
>>>>> otherwise, TDX guest boot could fail.
>>>>> A matching QEMU tree including this patch is here:
>>>>> https://github.com/intel-staging/qemu-tdx/releases/tag/tdx-qemu-upstream-v6.1-fix_kvm_hypercall_return_value
>>>>>
>>>>> Previously, the issue was not triggered because no one would modify the ret
>>>>> value. But with the refactor patch for __kvm_emulate_hypercall() in KVM,
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20241128004344.4072099-7-seanjc@google.com/, the
>>>>> value could be modified.
>>>>
>>>> Could you explain the specific reasons here in detail? It would be
>>>> helpful with debugging or reproducing the issue.
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 8 ++++++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>>>>> index 8e17942c3b..4bcccb48d1 100644
>>>>> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>>>>> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>>>>> @@ -6005,10 +6005,14 @@ static int kvm_handle_hc_map_gpa_range(struct kvm_run *run)
>>>>> static int kvm_handle_hypercall(struct kvm_run *run)
>>>>> {
>>>>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> if (run->hypercall.nr == KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE)
>>>>> - return kvm_handle_hc_map_gpa_range(run);
>>>>> + ret = kvm_handle_hc_map_gpa_range(run);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + run->hypercall.ret = ret;
>>>>
>>>> ret may be negative but hypercall.ret is u64. Do we need to set it to
>>>> -ret?
>>>
>>> If ret is less than zero, will stop the VM anyway as
>>> RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR.
>>>
>>> If this has to be fixed in QEMU, I think there's no need to set anything
>>> if ret != 0; also because kvm_convert_memory() returns -1 on error and
>>> that's not how the error would be passed to the guest.
>>>
>>> However, I think the right fix should simply be this in KVM:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> index 83fe0a78146f..e2118ba93ef6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> @@ -10066,6 +10066,7 @@ unsigned long __kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr,
>>> }
>>> vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
>>> + vcpu->run->ret = 0;
>>
>> vcpu->run->hypercall.ret
>>
>>> vcpu->run->hypercall.nr = KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE;
>>> vcpu->run->hypercall.args[0] = gpa;
>>> vcpu->run->hypercall.args[1] = npages;
>>>
>>> While there is arguably a change in behavior of the kernel both with
>>> the patches in kvm-coco-queue and with the above one, _in practice_
>>> the above change is one that userspace will not notice.
>>
>> I agree that KVM should initialize "ret", but I don't think '0' is the right
>> value. KVM shouldn't assume userspace will successfully handle the hypercall.
>> What happens if KVM sets vcpu->run->hypercall.ret to a non-zero value, e.g. -KVM_ENOSYS?
>
> Unfortunately QEMU is never writing vcpu->run->hypercall.ret, so the guest sees -KVM_ENOSYS; this is basically the same bug that Binbin is fixing, just with a different value passed to the guest.
>
> In other words, the above one-liner is pulling the "don't break userspace" card.
>
> Paolo
>
>
If the change need to be done in KVM, there are other 3 functions that use
KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL based on the code in kvm-coco-queue.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 40fe7258843e..a624f7289282 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -3633,6 +3633,7 @@ static int snp_begin_psc_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 ghcb_msr)
}
vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
+ vcpu->run->ret = 0;
vcpu->run->hypercall.nr = KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE;
vcpu->run->hypercall.args[0] = gpa;
vcpu->run->hypercall.args[1] = 1;
@@ -3796,6 +3797,7 @@ static int snp_begin_psc(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct psc_buffer *psc)
case VMGEXIT_PSC_OP_PRIVATE:
case VMGEXIT_PSC_OP_SHARED:
vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
+ vcpu->run->ret = 0;
vcpu->run->hypercall.nr = KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE;
vcpu->run->hypercall.args[0] = gfn_to_gpa(gfn);
vcpu->run->hypercall.args[1] = npages;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
index 85c8aee263c1..c50c2edc8c56 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
@@ -1161,6 +1161,7 @@ static void __tdx_map_gpa(struct vcpu_tdx * tdx)
pr_err("%s: gpa = 0x%llx, size = 0x%llx", __func__, gpa, size);
tdx->vcpu.run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
+ tdx->vcpu->run->ret = 0;
tdx->vcpu.run->hypercall.nr = KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE;
tdx->vcpu.run->hypercall.args[0] = gpa & ~gfn_to_gpa(kvm_gfn_direct_bits(tdx->vcpu.kvm));
tdx->vcpu.run->hypercall.args[1] = size / PAGE_SIZE;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 4f94b1e24eae..3f82bb2357e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -10070,6 +10070,7 @@ int ____kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr,
}
vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
+ vcpu->run->ret = 0;
vcpu->run->hypercall.nr = KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE;
vcpu->run->hypercall.args[0] = gpa;
vcpu->run->hypercall.args[1] = npages;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-13 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 3:26 [PATCH] i386/kvm: Set return value after handling KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL Binbin Wu
2024-12-12 3:41 ` Yao Yuan
2024-12-12 3:44 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-12 5:18 ` Binbin Wu
2024-12-12 7:09 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-12 7:24 ` Binbin Wu
2024-12-12 8:07 ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-12 16:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-12 19:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-12 21:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-12 22:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-13 1:46 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2024-12-13 1:52 ` Binbin Wu
2024-12-13 1:56 ` Binbin Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=745b2b6e-7dd0-4437-bbbf-673ddc0df014@linux.intel.com \
--to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=farrah.chen@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox