From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Zeng, Guang" <guang.zeng@intel.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@intel.com>, "Christopherson,,
Sean" <seanjc@google.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
"Zhong, Yang" <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] x86/fpu: Make XFD initialization in __fpstate_reset() a function argument
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:55:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7994877a-0c46-07a5-eab0-0a8dd6244e9a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YdxP0FVWEJa/vrPk@zn.tnic>
On 1/10/22 16:25, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> "Standard sign-off procedure applies, i.e. the ordering of
> Signed-off-by: tags should reflect the chronological history of
> the patch insofar as possible, regardless of whether the author
> is attributed via From: or Co-developed-by:. Notably, the last
> Signed-off-by: must always be that of the developer submitting the
> patch."
So this means that "the author must be the first SoB" is not an absolute
rule. In the case of this patch we had:
From: Jing Liu <jing2.liu@intel.com>
...
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jing Liu <jing2.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
and the possibilities could be:
1) have two SoB lines for Jing (before and after Thomas)
2) add a Co-developed-by for Thomas as the first line
3) do exactly what the gang did ("remain practical and do only an SOB
chain")
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-10 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-07 18:54 [PATCH v6 00/21] AMX support for KVM Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] x86/fpu: Extend fpu_xstate_prctl() with guest permissions Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] x86/fpu: Prepare guest FPU for dynamically enabled FPU features Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] kvm: x86: Fix xstate_required_size() to follow XSTATE alignment rule Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 04/21] kvm: x86: Exclude unpermitted xfeatures at KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-23 6:22 ` Like Xu
2022-01-24 7:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-01-07 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] x86/fpu: Make XFD initialization in __fpstate_reset() a function argument Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 19:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-10 5:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-01-10 8:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-10 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-10 15:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-10 15:55 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-01-10 18:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-11 1:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-01-07 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] x86/fpu: Add guest support to xfd_enable_feature() Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] x86/fpu: Provide fpu_enable_guest_xfd_features() for KVM Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-10 5:25 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-01-07 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] kvm: x86: Enable dynamic xfeatures at KVM_SET_CPUID2 Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] x86/fpu: Provide fpu_update_guest_xfd() for IA32_XFD emulation Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] kvm: x86: Add emulation for IA32_XFD Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] x86/fpu: Prepare xfd_err in struct fpu_guest Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] kvm: x86: Intercept #NM for saving IA32_XFD_ERR Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] kvm: x86: Emulate IA32_XFD_ERR for guest Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] kvm: x86: Disable RDMSR interception of IA32_XFD_ERR Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] kvm: x86: Add XCR0 support for Intel AMX Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] kvm: x86: Add CPUID " Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] x86/fpu: Add uabi_size to guest_fpu Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] kvm: x86: Add support for getting/setting expanded xstate buffer Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] kvm: selftests: Add support for KVM_CAP_XSAVE2 Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-17 16:51 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-18 2:06 ` Wang, Wei W
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] x86/fpu: Provide fpu_sync_guest_vmexit_xfd_state() Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 18:55 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] kvm: x86: Disable interception for IA32_XFD on demand Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7994877a-0c46-07a5-eab0-0a8dd6244e9a@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox