From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Drew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/9] travis.yml: Rework the x86 64-bit tests
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:44:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fddef3b-7a01-b084-d33a-b4e4f8291aed@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200924161612.144549-3-thuth@redhat.com>
On 24/09/2020 18.16, Thomas Huth wrote:
> We currently have three test jobs here:
>
> 1) gcc, in-tree build
> 2) gcc, out-of-tree build
> 3) clang, in-tree build
>
> Keeping everything in perspective, it should be sufficient to only use two
> build jobs for this, one in-tree with one compiler, and one out-of-tree
> with the other compiler.
> So let's re-order the jobs accordingly now. And while we're at it, make
> sure that all additional tests that work with the newer QEMU from Ubuntu
> Focal now are tested, too, and that we check all possible tests with
> Clang (i.e. the same list as with GCC except for the "realmode" test
> that still causes some problems with Clang).
This patch needs a rebase now since the realmode test has just been
fixed and added to .travis.yml ... I'll wait one or two more days for
review feedback, then respin a v2 with the conflict solved.
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-25 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-24 16:16 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/9] Update travis CI Thomas Huth
2020-09-24 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/9] travis.yml: Update from Bionic to Focal Thomas Huth
2020-09-24 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/9] travis.yml: Rework the x86 64-bit tests Thomas Huth
2020-09-25 6:44 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2020-09-24 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/9] travis.yml: Refresh the x86 32-bit test list Thomas Huth
2020-09-24 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/9] travis.yml: Add the selftest-setup ppc64 test Thomas Huth
2020-09-24 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/9] kbuild: fix asm-offset generation to work with clang Thomas Huth
2020-09-24 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/9] arm/pmu: Fix inline assembly for Clang Thomas Huth
2020-09-24 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 7/9] lib/arm64/spinlock: " Thomas Huth
2020-09-24 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 8/9] travis.yml: Rework the aarch64 jobs Thomas Huth
2020-09-24 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 9/9] travis.yml: Update the list of s390x tests Thomas Huth
2020-09-25 9:57 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-25 10:09 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7fddef3b-7a01-b084-d33a-b4e4f8291aed@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox