From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/5] nVMX: Simple posted interrupts test
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:48:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fe8970c-ecb7-4e46-be76-488d7697d8db@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231211185552.3856862-1-jmattson@google.com>
On 12/12/23 2:55 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> I reported recently that commit 26844fee6ade ("KVM: x86: never write to
> memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block()") broke delivery of a virtualized posted
> interrupt from an L1 vCPU to a halted L2 vCPU (see
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231207010302.2240506-1-jmattson@google.com/).
> The test that exposed the regression is the final patch of this series. The
> others are prerequisites.
>
> It would make sense to add "vmx_posted_interrupts_test" to the set of tests
> to be run under the unit test name, "vmx_apicv_test," but that is
> non-trivial. The vmx_posted_interrupts_test requires "smp = 2," but I find
> that adding that to the vmx_apicv_tests causes virt_x2apic_mode_test to
> fail with:
>
> FAIL: x2apic - reading 0x310: x86/vmx_tests.c:2151: Assertion failed: (expected) == (actual)
> LHS: 0x0000000000000012 - 0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0001'0010 - 18
> RHS: 0x0000000000000001 - 0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0001 - 1
> Expected VMX_VMCALL, got VMX_EXTINT.
> STACK: 406ef8 40725a 41299f 402036 403f59 4001bd
>
> I haven't investigated.
This vmx_apicv_test test still fails when 'ept=N' (SPR + v6.12-rc2):
--- Virtualize APIC accesses + Use TPR shadow test ---
FAIL: xapic - reading 0x080: read 0x0, expected 0x70.
FAIL: xapic - writing 0x12345678 to 0x080: exitless write; val is 0x0,
want 0x70
--- APIC-register virtualization test ---
FAIL: xapic - reading 0x020: read 0x0, expected 0x12345678.
FAIL: xapic - writing 0x12345678 to 0x020: x86/vmx_tests.c:2164:
Assertion failed: (expected) == (actual)
LHS: 0x0000000000000038 -
0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0011'1000
- 56
RHS: 0x0000000000000012 -
0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0000'0001'0010
- 18
Expected VMX_APIC_WRITE, got VMX_VMCALL.
STACK: 406f7f 40d178 40202f 403f54 4001bd
>
>
> Jim Mattson (1):
> nVMX: Enable x2APIC mode for virtual-interrupt delivery tests
>
> Marc Orr (Google) (3):
> nVMX: test nested "virtual-interrupt delivery"
> nVMX: test nested EOI virtualization
> nVMX: add self-IPI tests to vmx_basic_vid_test
>
> Oliver Upton (1):
> nVMX: add test for posted interrupts
>
> lib/x86/apic.h | 5 +
> lib/x86/asm/bitops.h | 8 +
> x86/unittests.cfg | 10 +-
> x86/vmx_tests.c | 423 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 445 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-09 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-11 18:55 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/5] nVMX: Simple posted interrupts test Jim Mattson
2023-12-11 18:55 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/5] nVMX: Enable x2APIC mode for virtual-interrupt delivery tests Jim Mattson
2023-12-11 18:55 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/5] nVMX: test nested "virtual-interrupt delivery" Jim Mattson
2023-12-11 18:55 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/5] nVMX: test nested EOI virtualization Jim Mattson
2023-12-11 18:55 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/5] nVMX: add self-IPI tests to vmx_basic_vid_test Jim Mattson
2023-12-11 18:55 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/5] nVMX: add test for posted interrupts Jim Mattson
2024-06-05 23:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/5] nVMX: Simple posted interrupts test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 6:48 ` Like Xu [this message]
2024-10-14 8:56 ` Chao Gao
2024-10-16 15:59 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7fe8970c-ecb7-4e46-be76-488d7697d8db@gmail.com \
--to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox