From: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
To: <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<rkrcmar@redhat.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/kvm/vmx: Don't halt vcpu when L1 is injecting events to L2
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 16:31:22 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <806c274d-5d9a-432a-bf04-f154be89cb7f@default> (raw)
----- chao.gao@intel.com wrote:
> Although L2 is in halt state, it will be in the active state after
> VM entry if the VM entry is vectoring according to SDM 26.6.2
> Activity
> State. Halting the vcpu here means the event won't be injected to L2
> and this decision isn't reported to L1. Thus L0 drops an event that
> should be injected to L2.
>
> Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Remove VID stuff. Only handle event injection in this patch.
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index bb5b488..42f39d9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -10985,7 +10985,12 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu, bool launch)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (vmcs12->guest_activity_state == GUEST_ACTIVITY_HLT)
> + /*
> + * If we're entering a halted L2 vcpu and the L2 vcpu won't be
> woken
> + * by event injection, halt vcpu for optimization.
I would remove the "for optimization." from the comment.
> + */
> + if ((vmcs12->guest_activity_state == GUEST_ACTIVITY_HLT) &&
> + !(vmcs12->vm_entry_intr_info_field &
> VECTORING_INFO_VALID_MASK))
VECTORING_INFO_VALID_MASK is used in KVM code against vmcs12->idt_vectoring_info_field.
I think you should use INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK to be consistent with rest of code.
> return kvm_vcpu_halt(vcpu);
>
> vmx->nested.nested_run_pending = 1;
> --
> 1.9.1
In addition, commit title should be written in format of:
"KVM: VMX: Don't halt vcpu when L1 is injecting events to L2"
(Makes it easier to grep in git log).
Other than that, seems good to me. :)
Reviewed-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Thanks,
-Liran
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-10 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-10 0:31 Liran Alon [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-09 5:09 [PATCH v2] x86/kvm/vmx: Don't halt vcpu when L1 is injecting events to L2 Chao Gao
2018-02-09 12:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=806c274d-5d9a-432a-bf04-f154be89cb7f@default \
--to=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).