From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Stop returning struct page from guest_memfd PFN lookup
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:12:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <807b4b9f-b1ca-4b5c-bc9e-22bf0637ba33@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818-gmem-no-return-page-v2-0-5298f42d49bb@google.com>
On 8/18/26 11:15, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> KVM currently expects kvm_gmem_get_pfn() to return a refcounted struct
> page. Callers (such as x86 TDP MMU, arm64 Stage-2 fault handler, and SEV-SNP
> VMSA / RMP handlers) hold this refcount across page fault handling.
>
> Holding a page refcount across fault handling is problematic for guest_memfd.
> In-place memory conversions between confidential computing shared and private
> states inspect folio refcounts to ensure exclusive ownership by guest_memfd. A
> concurrent guest page fault taking a reference on the folio causes conversions
> to fail due to an elevated refcount.
Right. Won't we still, at least temporarily, grab a reference while looking up
the folio in the page cache, or will we be preventing that concurrent race with
locking?
>
> guest_memfd already notifies KVM of page invalidations, so users of guest_memfd
> within KVM only need to respect the MMU invalidation protocol to safely rely on
> guest_memfd to ensure page presence.
Yes, the invalidation protocol is the crucial part. If we get that wrong, we're
in holy CVE land.
For GUP-fast, there was a similar discussion with MMU notifiers, but to this
day, KVM actually grabs+drops references.
[...]
> Removing struct page from kvm_gmem_get_pfn() also moves KVM closer toward
> supporting memory backends that are not backed by struct page.
Agreed, they should not be messing with the struct page at all.
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 9:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] Stop returning struct page from guest_memfd PFN lookup Ackerley Tng
2026-08-18 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: SEV: Treat unassigned RMP entry as benign race on PSMASH failure Ackerley Tng
2026-08-18 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: SEV: Drop page refcount early during RMP fault handling Ackerley Tng
2026-08-18 9:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: SEV: Drop page refcount early in VMSA reload Ackerley Tng
2026-08-18 9:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: guest_memfd: Stop returning struct page from PFN lookup Ackerley Tng
2026-08-18 9:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 13:58 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-18 17:12 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-08-18 19:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Stop returning struct page from guest_memfd " Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=807b4b9f-b1ca-4b5c-bc9e-22bf0637ba33@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox