Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Stop returning struct page from guest_memfd PFN lookup
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:12:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <807b4b9f-b1ca-4b5c-bc9e-22bf0637ba33@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818-gmem-no-return-page-v2-0-5298f42d49bb@google.com>

On 8/18/26 11:15, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> KVM currently expects kvm_gmem_get_pfn() to return a refcounted struct
> page. Callers (such as x86 TDP MMU, arm64 Stage-2 fault handler, and SEV-SNP
> VMSA / RMP handlers) hold this refcount across page fault handling.
> 
> Holding a page refcount across fault handling is problematic for guest_memfd.
> In-place memory conversions between confidential computing shared and private
> states inspect folio refcounts to ensure exclusive ownership by guest_memfd.  A
> concurrent guest page fault taking a reference on the folio causes conversions
> to fail due to an elevated refcount.

Right. Won't we still, at least temporarily, grab a reference while looking up
the folio in the page cache, or will we be preventing that concurrent race with
locking?

> 
> guest_memfd already notifies KVM of page invalidations, so users of guest_memfd
> within KVM only need to respect the MMU invalidation protocol to safely rely on
> guest_memfd to ensure page presence.

Yes, the invalidation protocol is the crucial part. If we get that wrong, we're
in holy CVE land.

For GUP-fast, there was a similar discussion with MMU notifiers, but to this
day, KVM actually grabs+drops references.

[...]

> Removing struct page from kvm_gmem_get_pfn() also moves KVM closer toward
> supporting memory backends that are not backed by struct page.

Agreed, they should not be messing with the struct page at all.

-- 
Cheers,

David

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-18 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-18  9:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] Stop returning struct page from guest_memfd PFN lookup Ackerley Tng
2026-08-18  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: SEV: Treat unassigned RMP entry as benign race on PSMASH failure Ackerley Tng
2026-08-18  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: SEV: Drop page refcount early during RMP fault handling Ackerley Tng
2026-08-18  9:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: SEV: Drop page refcount early in VMSA reload Ackerley Tng
2026-08-18  9:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: guest_memfd: Stop returning struct page from PFN lookup Ackerley Tng
2026-08-18  9:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 13:58   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-18 17:12 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-08-18 19:55   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Stop returning struct page from guest_memfd " Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=807b4b9f-b1ca-4b5c-bc9e-22bf0637ba33@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox