Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liangyan <liangyan.peng@bytedance.com>
To: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
	Liangyan <liangyan.peng@bytedance.com>,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, wanpengli@tencent.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [RFC] x86/kvm: Use native qspinlock by default when realtime hinted
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 20:23:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8145bb17-8ba4-4d9d-a995-5f8b09db99c4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <806e3449-a7b1-fa57-b220-b791428fb28b@loongson.cn>

We test that unixbench spawn has big improvement in Intel 8582c 120-CPU 
guest vm if switch to qspinlock.

Command: ./Run -c 120 spawn

Use virt_spin_lock:
System Benchmarks Partial Index   BASELINE       RESULT  INDEX
Process Creation                     126.0      71878.4   5704.6
                                                         ========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)              5704.6


Use qspinlock:
System Benchmarks Partial Index   BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Process Creation                     126.0     173566.6  13775.1
                                                         ========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only              13775.1


Regards,
Liangyan

On 2025/7/2 16:19, Bibo Mao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2025/7/2 下午2:42, Liangyan wrote:
>> When KVM_HINTS_REALTIME is set and KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT is clear,
>> currently guest will use virt_spin_lock.
>> Since KVM_HINTS_REALTIME is set, use native qspinlock should be safe
>> and have better performance than virt_spin_lock.
> Just be curious, do you have actual data where native qspinlock has 
> better performance than virt_spin_lock()?
> 
> By my understanding, qspinlock is not friendly with VM. When lock is 
> released, it is acquired with one by one order in contending queue. If 
> the first vCPU in contending queue is preempted, the other vCPUs can not 
> get lock. On physical machine it is almost impossible that CPU 
> contending lock is preempted.
> 
> Regards
> Bibo Mao
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liangyan <liangyan.peng@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> index 921c1c783bc1..9080544a4007 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> @@ -1072,6 +1072,15 @@ static void kvm_wait(u8 *ptr, u8 val)
>>    */
>>   void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void)
>>   {
>> +    /*
>> +     * Disable PV spinlocks and use native qspinlock when dedicated 
>> pCPUs
>> +     * are available.
>> +     */
>> +    if (kvm_para_has_hint(KVM_HINTS_REALTIME)) {
>> +        pr_info("PV spinlocks disabled with KVM_HINTS_REALTIME 
>> hints\n");
>> +        goto out;
>> +    }
>> +
>>       /*
>>        * In case host doesn't support KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT there is 
>> still an
>>        * advantage of keeping virt_spin_lock_key enabled: 
>> virt_spin_lock() is
>> @@ -1082,15 +1091,6 @@ void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void)
>>           return;
>>       }
>> -    /*
>> -     * Disable PV spinlocks and use native qspinlock when dedicated 
>> pCPUs
>> -     * are available.
>> -     */
>> -    if (kvm_para_has_hint(KVM_HINTS_REALTIME)) {
>> -        pr_info("PV spinlocks disabled with KVM_HINTS_REALTIME 
>> hints\n");
>> -        goto out;
>> -    }
>> -
>>       if (num_possible_cpus() == 1) {
>>           pr_info("PV spinlocks disabled, single CPU\n");
>>           goto out;
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-02 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-02  6:42 [RFC] x86/kvm: Use native qspinlock by default when realtime hinted Liangyan
2025-07-02  8:19 ` Bibo Mao
2025-07-02 12:23   ` Liangyan [this message]
2025-07-02 16:26     ` [External] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2025-07-04  6:12       ` [External] Re: [PATCH RFC] " Liangyan
2025-07-05  6:39     ` [External] Re: [RFC] " Bibo Mao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8145bb17-8ba4-4d9d-a995-5f8b09db99c4@google.com \
    --to=liangyan.peng@bytedance.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox