From: Liangyan <liangyan.peng@bytedance.com>
To: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
Liangyan <liangyan.peng@bytedance.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, wanpengli@tencent.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [RFC] x86/kvm: Use native qspinlock by default when realtime hinted
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 20:23:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8145bb17-8ba4-4d9d-a995-5f8b09db99c4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <806e3449-a7b1-fa57-b220-b791428fb28b@loongson.cn>
We test that unixbench spawn has big improvement in Intel 8582c 120-CPU
guest vm if switch to qspinlock.
Command: ./Run -c 120 spawn
Use virt_spin_lock:
System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Process Creation 126.0 71878.4 5704.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 5704.6
Use qspinlock:
System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Process Creation 126.0 173566.6 13775.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only 13775.1
Regards,
Liangyan
On 2025/7/2 16:19, Bibo Mao wrote:
>
>
> On 2025/7/2 下午2:42, Liangyan wrote:
>> When KVM_HINTS_REALTIME is set and KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT is clear,
>> currently guest will use virt_spin_lock.
>> Since KVM_HINTS_REALTIME is set, use native qspinlock should be safe
>> and have better performance than virt_spin_lock.
> Just be curious, do you have actual data where native qspinlock has
> better performance than virt_spin_lock()?
>
> By my understanding, qspinlock is not friendly with VM. When lock is
> released, it is acquired with one by one order in contending queue. If
> the first vCPU in contending queue is preempted, the other vCPUs can not
> get lock. On physical machine it is almost impossible that CPU
> contending lock is preempted.
>
> Regards
> Bibo Mao
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liangyan <liangyan.peng@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> index 921c1c783bc1..9080544a4007 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> @@ -1072,6 +1072,15 @@ static void kvm_wait(u8 *ptr, u8 val)
>> */
>> void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void)
>> {
>> + /*
>> + * Disable PV spinlocks and use native qspinlock when dedicated
>> pCPUs
>> + * are available.
>> + */
>> + if (kvm_para_has_hint(KVM_HINTS_REALTIME)) {
>> + pr_info("PV spinlocks disabled with KVM_HINTS_REALTIME
>> hints\n");
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> /*
>> * In case host doesn't support KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT there is
>> still an
>> * advantage of keeping virt_spin_lock_key enabled:
>> virt_spin_lock() is
>> @@ -1082,15 +1091,6 @@ void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void)
>> return;
>> }
>> - /*
>> - * Disable PV spinlocks and use native qspinlock when dedicated
>> pCPUs
>> - * are available.
>> - */
>> - if (kvm_para_has_hint(KVM_HINTS_REALTIME)) {
>> - pr_info("PV spinlocks disabled with KVM_HINTS_REALTIME
>> hints\n");
>> - goto out;
>> - }
>> -
>> if (num_possible_cpus() == 1) {
>> pr_info("PV spinlocks disabled, single CPU\n");
>> goto out;
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 6:42 [RFC] x86/kvm: Use native qspinlock by default when realtime hinted Liangyan
2025-07-02 8:19 ` Bibo Mao
2025-07-02 12:23 ` Liangyan [this message]
2025-07-02 16:26 ` [External] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2025-07-04 6:12 ` [External] Re: [PATCH RFC] " Liangyan
2025-07-05 6:39 ` [External] Re: [RFC] " Bibo Mao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8145bb17-8ba4-4d9d-a995-5f8b09db99c4@google.com \
--to=liangyan.peng@bytedance.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox