From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: x86: Expose Architectural LBR CPUID and its XSAVES bit
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:37:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8321d54b-173b-722b-ddce-df2f9bd7abc4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210203135714.318356-5-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
On 03/02/21 14:57, Like Xu wrote:
> If CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=0):EDX[19] is exposed to 1, the KVM supports Arch
> LBRs and CPUID leaf 01CH indicates details of the Arch LBRs capabilities.
> As the first step, KVM only exposes the current LBR depth on the host for
> guest, which is likely to be the maximum supported value on the host.
>
> If KVM supports XSAVES, the CPUID.(EAX=0DH, ECX=1):EDX:ECX[bit 15]
> is also exposed to 1, which means the availability of support for Arch
> LBR configuration state save and restore. When available, guest software
> operating at CPL=0 can use XSAVES/XRSTORS manage supervisor state
> component Arch LBR for own purposes once IA32_XSS [bit 15] is set.
> XSAVE support for Arch LBRs is enumerated in CPUID.(EAX=0DH, ECX=0FH).
>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 944f518ca91b..900149eec42d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -778,6 +778,29 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function)
> entry->edx = 0;
> }
> break;
> + /* Architectural LBR */
> + case 0x1c:
> + {
> + u64 lbr_depth_mask = 0;
> +
> + if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR)) {
> + entry->eax = entry->ebx = entry->ecx = entry->edx = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * KVM only exposes the maximum supported depth,
> + * which is also the fixed value used on the host.
> + *
> + * KVM doesn't allow VMM user sapce to adjust depth
> + * per guest, because the guest LBR emulation depends
> + * on the implementation of the host LBR driver.
> + */
> + lbr_depth_mask = 1UL << fls(entry->eax & 0xff);
> + entry->eax &= ~0xff;
> + entry->eax |= lbr_depth_mask;
> + break;
> + }
> /* Intel PT */
> case 0x14:
> if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT)) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 9ddf0a14d75c..c22175d9564e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -7498,6 +7498,8 @@ static __init void vmx_set_cpu_caps(void)
> kvm_cpu_cap_check_and_set(X86_FEATURE_INVPCID);
> if (vmx_pt_mode_is_host_guest())
> kvm_cpu_cap_check_and_set(X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT);
> + if (cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> + kvm_cpu_cap_check_and_set(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR);
>
> if (vmx_umip_emulated())
> kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_UMIP);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 667d0042d0b7..107f2e72f526 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -10385,8 +10385,16 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque)
>
> if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES))
> supported_xss = 0;
> - else
> + else {
> supported_xss &= host_xss;
> + /*
> + * The host doesn't always set ARCH_LBR bit to hoss_xss since this
> + * Arch_LBR component is used on demand in the Arch LBR driver.
> + * Check e649b3f0188f "Support dynamic supervisor feature for LBR".
> + */
> + if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
> + supported_xss |= XFEATURE_MASK_LBR;
> + }
>
> /* Update CET features now that supported_xss is finalized. */
> if (!kvm_cet_supported()) {
>
This requires some of the XSS patches that Weijang posted for CET, right?
Also, who takes care of saving/restoring the MSRs, if the host has not
added XFEATURE_MASK_LBR to MSR_IA32_XSS?
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-03 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-03 13:57 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Guest Architectural LBR Enabling Like Xu
2021-02-03 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: vmx/pmu: Add MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH emulation for Arch LBR Like Xu
2021-03-01 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-02 2:52 ` Like Xu
2021-02-03 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: vmx/pmu: Add MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL " Like Xu
2021-02-03 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: vmx/pmu: Add Arch LBR emulation and its VMCS field Like Xu
2021-02-03 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: x86: Expose Architectural LBR CPUID and its XSAVES bit Like Xu
2021-02-03 14:37 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-02-04 0:59 ` Xu, Like
2021-02-05 8:16 ` Xu, Like
2021-02-05 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-07 1:02 ` Xu, Like
2021-02-08 10:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-14 1:00 ` Xu, Like
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8321d54b-173b-722b-ddce-df2f9bd7abc4@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox