From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: nVMX: fix nested_vmx_check_vmptr failure paths under debugging
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 16:34:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8572fc73-7d3c-8e87-4e3f-d2645e24dbef@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170519134851.10616-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
On 19/05/2017 15:48, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() will return 0 if userspace is
> single-stepping the guest.
>
> kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() uses return status convention of exit
> handler: 0 means "exit to userspace" and 1 means "continue vm entries".
> The problem is that nested_vmx_check_vmptr() return status means
> something else: 0 is ok, 1 is error.
>
> This means we would continue executing after a failure. Static checker
> noticed it because vmptr was not initialized.
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Fixes: 6affcbedcac7 ("KVM: x86: Add kvm_skip_emulated_instruction and use it.")
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> ---
> Second try -- moves a lot of code around to make it less ugly and keep
> the same behavior as v1, hopefully.
>
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 9ff1b04502c9..dd274db9bf77 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -6914,97 +6914,21 @@ static int get_vmx_mem_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * This function performs the various checks including
> - * - if it's 4KB aligned
> - * - No bits beyond the physical address width are set
> - * - Returns 0 on success or else 1
> - * (Intel SDM Section 30.3)
> - */
> -static int nested_vmx_check_vmptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int exit_reason,
> - gpa_t *vmpointer)
> +static int nested_vmx_get_vmptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t *vmpointer)
> {
> gva_t gva;
> - gpa_t vmptr;
> struct x86_exception e;
> - struct page *page;
> - struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> - int maxphyaddr = cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu);
>
> if (get_vmx_mem_address(vcpu, vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION),
> vmcs_read32(VMX_INSTRUCTION_INFO), false, &gva))
> return 1;
>
> - if (kvm_read_guest_virt(&vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt, gva, &vmptr,
> - sizeof(vmptr), &e)) {
> + if (kvm_read_guest_virt(&vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt, gva, vmpointer,
> + sizeof(*vmpointer), &e)) {
> kvm_inject_page_fault(vcpu, &e);
> return 1;
> }
>
> - switch (exit_reason) {
> - case EXIT_REASON_VMON:
> - /*
> - * SDM 3: 24.11.5
> - * The first 4 bytes of VMXON region contain the supported
> - * VMCS revision identifier
> - *
> - * Note - IA32_VMX_BASIC[48] will never be 1
> - * for the nested case;
> - * which replaces physical address width with 32
> - *
> - */
> - if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vmptr) || (vmptr >> maxphyaddr)) {
> - nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);
> - return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> - }
> -
> - page = nested_get_page(vcpu, vmptr);
> - if (page == NULL) {
> - nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);
> - return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> - }
> - if (*(u32 *)kmap(page) != VMCS12_REVISION) {
> - kunmap(page);
> - nested_release_page_clean(page);
> - nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);
> - return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> - }
> - kunmap(page);
> - nested_release_page_clean(page);
> - vmx->nested.vmxon_ptr = vmptr;
> - break;
> - case EXIT_REASON_VMCLEAR:
> - if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vmptr) || (vmptr >> maxphyaddr)) {
> - nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu,
> - VMXERR_VMCLEAR_INVALID_ADDRESS);
> - return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> - }
> -
> - if (vmptr == vmx->nested.vmxon_ptr) {
> - nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu,
> - VMXERR_VMCLEAR_VMXON_POINTER);
> - return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> - }
> - break;
> - case EXIT_REASON_VMPTRLD:
> - if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vmptr) || (vmptr >> maxphyaddr)) {
> - nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu,
> - VMXERR_VMPTRLD_INVALID_ADDRESS);
> - return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> - }
> -
> - if (vmptr == vmx->nested.vmxon_ptr) {
> - nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu,
> - VMXERR_VMPTRLD_VMXON_POINTER);
> - return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> - }
> - break;
> - default:
> - return 1; /* shouldn't happen */
> - }
> -
> - if (vmpointer)
> - *vmpointer = vmptr;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -7066,6 +6990,8 @@ static int enter_vmx_operation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> static int handle_vmon(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> int ret;
> + gpa_t vmptr;
> + struct page *page;
> struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> const u64 VMXON_NEEDED_FEATURES = FEATURE_CONTROL_LOCKED
> | FEATURE_CONTROL_VMXON_ENABLED_OUTSIDE_SMX;
> @@ -7095,9 +7021,37 @@ static int handle_vmon(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return 1;
> }
>
> - if (nested_vmx_check_vmptr(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_VMON, NULL))
> + if (nested_vmx_get_vmptr(vcpu, &vmptr))
> return 1;
> -
> +
> + /*
> + * SDM 3: 24.11.5
> + * The first 4 bytes of VMXON region contain the supported
> + * VMCS revision identifier
> + *
> + * Note - IA32_VMX_BASIC[48] will never be 1 for the nested case;
> + * which replaces physical address width with 32
> + */
> + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vmptr) || (vmptr >> cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu))) {
> + nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);
> + return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> + }
> +
> + page = nested_get_page(vcpu, vmptr);
> + if (page == NULL) {
> + nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);
> + return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> + }
> + if (*(u32 *)kmap(page) != VMCS12_REVISION) {
> + kunmap(page);
> + nested_release_page_clean(page);
> + nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);
> + return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> + }
> + kunmap(page);
> + nested_release_page_clean(page);
> +
> + vmx->nested.vmxon_ptr = vmptr;
> ret = enter_vmx_operation(vcpu);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -7213,9 +7167,19 @@ static int handle_vmclear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!nested_vmx_check_permission(vcpu))
> return 1;
>
> - if (nested_vmx_check_vmptr(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_VMCLEAR, &vmptr))
> + if (nested_vmx_get_vmptr(vcpu, &vmptr))
> return 1;
>
> + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vmptr) || (vmptr >> cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu))) {
> + nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_VMCLEAR_INVALID_ADDRESS);
> + return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> + }
> +
> + if (vmptr == vmx->nested.vmxon_ptr) {
> + nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_VMCLEAR_VMXON_POINTER);
> + return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> + }
> +
> if (vmptr == vmx->nested.current_vmptr)
> nested_release_vmcs12(vmx);
>
> @@ -7545,9 +7509,19 @@ static int handle_vmptrld(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!nested_vmx_check_permission(vcpu))
> return 1;
>
> - if (nested_vmx_check_vmptr(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_VMPTRLD, &vmptr))
> + if (nested_vmx_get_vmptr(vcpu, &vmptr))
> return 1;
>
> + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vmptr) || (vmptr >> cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu))) {
> + nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_VMPTRLD_INVALID_ADDRESS);
> + return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> + }
> +
> + if (vmptr == vmx->nested.vmxon_ptr) {
> + nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_VMPTRLD_VMXON_POINTER);
> + return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> + }
> +
> if (vmx->nested.current_vmptr != vmptr) {
> struct vmcs12 *new_vmcs12;
> struct page *page;
>
Nice, diffstat speaks for itself. Queuing it.
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-30 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-18 17:37 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: fix bugs reported by Dan Carpenter Radim Krčmář
2017-05-18 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: nVMX: fix nested_vmx_check_vmptr failure paths under debugging Radim Krčmář
2017-05-19 13:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Radim Krčmář
2017-05-30 14:34 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-05-18 17:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: zero base3 of unusable segments Radim Krčmář
2017-05-19 13:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-05-18 17:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/vPMU: fix undefined shift in intel_pmu_refresh() Radim Krčmář
2017-05-19 13:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-05-18 17:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: prevent uninitialized variable warning in check_svme() Radim Krčmář
2017-05-19 13:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-05-18 18:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: fix bugs reported by Dan Carpenter Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-18 19:25 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8572fc73-7d3c-8e87-4e3f-d2645e24dbef@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox