From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: x86: Refactor __kvm_emulate_hypercall() into a macro
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 16:01:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86e1f270-0bf1-4ac2-9195-4092d21c5888@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241128004344.4072099-7-seanjc@google.com>
On 11/28/2024 8:43 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Rework __kvm_emulate_hypercall() into a macro so that completion of
> hypercalls that don't exit to userspace use direct function calls to the
> completion helper, i.e. don't trigger a retpoline when RETPOLINE=y.
>
> Opportunistically take the names of the input registers, as opposed to
> taking the input values, to preemptively dedup more of the calling code
> (TDX needs to use different registers). Use the direct GPR accessors to
> read values to avoid the pointless marking of the registers as available
> (KVM requires GPRs to always be available).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 29 +++++++++--------------------
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 39be2a891ab4..fef8b4e63d25 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -9982,11 +9982,11 @@ static int complete_hypercall_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> }
>
> -int __kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr,
> - unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1,
> - unsigned long a2, unsigned long a3,
> - int op_64_bit, int cpl,
> - int (*complete_hypercall)(struct kvm_vcpu *))
> +int ____kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr,
> + unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1,
> + unsigned long a2, unsigned long a3,
> + int op_64_bit, int cpl,
> + int (*complete_hypercall)(struct kvm_vcpu *))
> {
> unsigned long ret;
>
> @@ -10073,32 +10073,21 @@ int __kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr,
>
> out:
> vcpu->run->hypercall.ret = ret;
> - complete_hypercall(vcpu);
> return 1;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_emulate_hypercall);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(____kvm_emulate_hypercall);
>
> int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3;
> - int op_64_bit;
> - int cpl;
> -
> if (kvm_xen_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm))
> return kvm_xen_hypercall(vcpu);
>
> if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu))
> return kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu);
>
> - nr = kvm_rax_read(vcpu);
> - a0 = kvm_rbx_read(vcpu);
> - a1 = kvm_rcx_read(vcpu);
> - a2 = kvm_rdx_read(vcpu);
> - a3 = kvm_rsi_read(vcpu);
> - op_64_bit = is_64_bit_hypercall(vcpu);
> - cpl = kvm_x86_call(get_cpl)(vcpu);
> -
> - return __kvm_emulate_hypercall(vcpu, nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, op_64_bit, cpl,
> + return __kvm_emulate_hypercall(vcpu, rax, rbx, rcx, rdx, rsi,
> + is_64_bit_hypercall(vcpu),
> + kvm_x86_call(get_cpl)(vcpu),
> complete_hypercall_exit);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_emulate_hypercall);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> index 28adc8ea04bf..ad6fe6159dea 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -617,11 +617,26 @@ static inline bool user_exit_on_hypercall(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hc_nr)
> return kvm->arch.hypercall_exit_enabled & BIT(hc_nr);
> }
>
> -int __kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr,
> - unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1,
> - unsigned long a2, unsigned long a3,
> - int op_64_bit, int cpl,
> - int (*complete_hypercall)(struct kvm_vcpu *));
> +int ____kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr,
> + unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1,
> + unsigned long a2, unsigned long a3,
> + int op_64_bit, int cpl,
> + int (*complete_hypercall)(struct kvm_vcpu *));
> +
> +#define __kvm_emulate_hypercall(_vcpu, nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, op_64_bit, cpl, complete_hypercall) \
> +({ \
> + int __ret; \
> + \
> + __ret = ____kvm_emulate_hypercall(_vcpu, \
> + kvm_##nr##_read(_vcpu), kvm_##a0##_read(_vcpu), \
> + kvm_##a1##_read(_vcpu), kvm_##a2##_read(_vcpu), \
> + kvm_##a3##_read(_vcpu), op_64_bit, cpl, \
> + complete_hypercall); \
> + \
> + if (__ret > 0) \
> + complete_hypercall(_vcpu); \
> + __ret; \
> +})
>
> int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-03 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-28 0:43 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: x86: Prep KVM hypercall handling for TDX Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: x86: Play nice with protected guests in complete_hypercall_exit() Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 3:22 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-11-29 9:01 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-12-02 18:54 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-03 7:29 ` Binbin Wu
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: x86: Add a helper to check for user interception of KVM hypercalls Sean Christopherson
2024-12-02 18:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: x86: Move "emulate hypercall" function declarations to x86.h Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 3:23 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-02 20:05 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-03 7:33 ` Binbin Wu
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: x86: Bump hypercall stat prior to fully completing hypercall Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 3:24 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-02 20:13 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:33 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-03 7:37 ` Binbin Wu
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: x86: Always complete hypercall via function callback Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 3:08 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-02 18:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-02 20:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-03 0:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: x86: Refactor __kvm_emulate_hypercall() into a macro Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 8:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-12-10 16:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-10 20:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-12 7:32 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-12-12 15:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-12 18:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-03 8:01 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2024-12-10 16:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-10 20:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 1:06 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: x86: Prep KVM hypercall handling for TDX Huang, Kai
2024-12-19 2:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-15 9:40 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-17 19:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-20 0:37 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-21 18:04 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86e1f270-0bf1-4ac2-9195-4092d21c5888@linux.intel.com \
--to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox