From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Stop printing about MMIO accesses where ISV==0
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:41:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86fs1z3xia.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTjQ43gpJUvfh6rG@linux.dev>
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:25:07 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 09:04:58AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > While I totally agree that this *debug* statement should go, we should
> > also replace it with something else.
> >
> > Because when you're trying to debug a guest (or even KVM itself),
> > seeing this message is a sure indication that the guest is performing
> > an access outside of memory. The fact that KVM tries to handle it as
> > MMIO is just an implementation artefact.
> >
> > So I'd very much welcome a replacement tracepoint giving a bit more
> > information, such as guest PC, IPA being accessed, load or store. With
> > that, everybody wins.
>
> Aren't we already covered by the kvm_guest_fault tracepoint? Userspace
> can filter events on ESR to get the faults it cares about. I'm not
> against adding another tracepoint, but in my experience kvm_guest_fault
> has been rather useful for debugging any type of guest fault.
That tracepoint is one of the most triggered, and sifting through this
is a painful experience. If we go down that road, adding a bit of
extra documentation (pointed to from the KVM_RUN entry) and an example
filter script would be most useful.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-25 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-24 21:07 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Stop printing about MMIO accesses where ISV==0 Oliver Upton
2023-10-25 8:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-25 8:25 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-25 8:41 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-10-26 8:23 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86fs1z3xia.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox