From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Shih-Wei Li <shihwei@cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/40] KVM: arm64: Avoid storing the vcpu pointer on the stack
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:34:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86fu5ulgpc.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180215210332.8648-4-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:02:55 +0000,
Christoffer Dall wrote:
>
> We already have the percpu area for the host cpu state, which points to
> the VCPU, so there's no need to store the VCPU pointer on the stack on
> every context switch. We can be a little more clever and just use
> tpidr_el2 for the percpu offset and load the VCPU pointer from the host
> context.
>
> This does require us to calculate the percpu offset without including
> the offset from the kernel mapping of the percpu array to the linear
> mapping of the array (which is what we store in tpidr_el1), because a
> PC-relative generated address in EL2 is already giving us the hyp alias
> of the linear mapping of a kernel address. We do this in
> __cpu_init_hyp_mode() by using kvm_ksym_ref().
>
> This change also requires us to have a scratch register, so we take the
> chance to rearrange some of the el1_sync code to only look at the
> vttbr_el2 to determine if this is a trap from the guest or an HVC from
> the host. We do add an extra check to call the panic code if the kernel
> is configured with debugging enabled and we saw a trap from the host
> which wasn't an HVC, indicating that we left some EL2 trap configured by
> mistake.
>
> The code that accesses ESR_EL2 was previously using an alternative to
> use the _EL1 accessor on VHE systems, but this was actually unnecessary
> as the _EL1 accessor aliases the ESR_EL2 register on VHE, and the _EL2
> accessor does the same thing on both systems.
>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Changes since v3:
> - Reworked the assembly part of the patch after rebasing on v4.16-rc1
> which created a conflict with the variant 2 mitigations.
> - Removed Marc's reviewed-by due to the rework.
> - Removed unneeded extern keyword in declaration in header file
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Use PC-relative addressing to access per-cpu variables instead of
> using a load from the literal pool.
> - Remove stale comments as pointed out by Marc
> - Reworded the commit message as suggested by Drew
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S | 6 +-----
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 5 +----
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 5 +++++
> 7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> index 24961b732e65..6b626750b0a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY_SHIFT 0
> #define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY (1 << KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY_SHIFT)
>
> +/* Translate a kernel address of @sym into its equivalent linear mapping */
> #define kvm_ksym_ref(sym) \
> ({ \
> void *val = &sym; \
> @@ -70,6 +71,19 @@ extern u32 __init_stage2_translation(void);
>
> extern void __qcom_hyp_sanitize_btac_predictors(void);
>
> +#else /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +.macro get_host_ctxt reg, tmp
> + adr_l \reg, kvm_host_cpu_state
> + mrs \tmp, tpidr_el2
> + add \reg, \reg, \tmp
> +.endm
> +
> +.macro get_vcpu vcpu, ctxt
> + ldr \vcpu, [\ctxt, #HOST_CONTEXT_VCPU]
> + kern_hyp_va \vcpu
> +.endm
> +
> #endif
>
> #endif /* __ARM_KVM_ASM_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 596f8e414a4c..618cfee7206a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -358,10 +358,15 @@ int kvm_perf_teardown(void);
>
> struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
>
> +void __kvm_set_tpidr_el2(u64 tpidr_el2);
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(kvm_cpu_context_t, kvm_host_cpu_state);
> +
> static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(phys_addr_t pgd_ptr,
> unsigned long hyp_stack_ptr,
> unsigned long vector_ptr)
> {
> + u64 tpidr_el2;
> +
> /*
> * Call initialization code, and switch to the full blown HYP code.
> * If the cpucaps haven't been finalized yet, something has gone very
> @@ -370,6 +375,16 @@ static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(phys_addr_t pgd_ptr,
> */
> BUG_ON(!static_branch_likely(&arm64_const_caps_ready));
> __kvm_call_hyp((void *)pgd_ptr, hyp_stack_ptr, vector_ptr);
> +
> + /*
> + * Calculate the raw per-cpu offset without a translation from the
> + * kernel's mapping to the linear mapping, and store it in tpidr_el2
> + * so that we can use adr_l to access per-cpu variables in EL2.
> + */
> + tpidr_el2 = (u64)this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_cpu_state)
> + - (u64)kvm_ksym_ref(kvm_host_cpu_state);
> +
> + kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_set_tpidr_el2, tpidr_el2);
> }
>
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index 1303e04110cd..78e1b0a70aaf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ int main(void)
> DEFINE(CPU_FP_REGS, offsetof(struct kvm_regs, fp_regs));
> DEFINE(VCPU_FPEXC32_EL2, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.ctxt.sys_regs[FPEXC32_EL2]));
> DEFINE(VCPU_HOST_CONTEXT, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.host_cpu_context));
> + DEFINE(HOST_CONTEXT_VCPU, offsetof(struct kvm_cpu_context, __hyp_running_vcpu));
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
> DEFINE(CPU_SUSPEND_SZ, sizeof(struct cpu_suspend_ctx));
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> index fdd1068ee3a5..1f458f7c3b44 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> @@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ ENTRY(__guest_enter)
> // Store the host regs
> save_callee_saved_regs x1
>
> - // Store host_ctxt and vcpu for use at exit time
> - stp x1, x0, [sp, #-16]!
> -
> add x18, x0, #VCPU_CONTEXT
>
> // Restore guest regs x0-x17
> @@ -118,8 +115,7 @@ ENTRY(__guest_exit)
> // Store the guest regs x19-x29, lr
> save_callee_saved_regs x1
>
> - // Restore the host_ctxt from the stack
> - ldr x2, [sp], #16
> + get_host_ctxt x2, x3
>
> // Now restore the host regs
> restore_callee_saved_regs x2
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S
> index f36464bd57c5..559b4d54bc42 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S
> @@ -57,13 +57,8 @@ ENDPROC(__vhe_hyp_call)
> el1_sync: // Guest trapped into EL2
> stp x0, x1, [sp, #-16]!
>
> -alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN
> - mrs x1, esr_el2
> -alternative_else
> - mrs x1, esr_el1
> -alternative_endif
> - lsr x0, x1, #ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT
> -
> + mrs x0, esr_el2
> + lsr x0, x0, #ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT
> cmp x0, #ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64
> ccmp x0, #ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32, #4, ne
> b.ne el1_trap
> @@ -117,10 +112,15 @@ el1_hvc_guest:
> eret
>
> el1_trap:
> + get_host_ctxt x0, x1
> + get_vcpu x1, x0
> +
> + mrs x0, esr_el2
> + lsr x0, x0, #ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT
> /*
> * x0: ESR_EC
> + * x1: vcpu pointer
> */
> - ldr x1, [sp, #16 + 8] // vcpu stored by __guest_enter
>
> /*
> * We trap the first access to the FP/SIMD to save the host context
> @@ -138,13 +138,15 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
>
> el1_irq:
> stp x0, x1, [sp, #-16]!
> - ldr x1, [sp, #16 + 8]
> + get_host_ctxt x0, x1
> + get_vcpu x1, x0
> mov x0, #ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ
> b __guest_exit
>
> el1_error:
> stp x0, x1, [sp, #-16]!
> - ldr x1, [sp, #16 + 8]
> + get_host_ctxt x0, x1
> + get_vcpu x1, x0
Given how frequent this construct is, would there be a benefit in
having something like "get_vcpu_ptr" that conflates the two macros? We
don't seem to have a single case of using get_vcpu on its own.
> mov x0, #ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR
> b __guest_exit
>
> @@ -180,14 +182,7 @@ ENTRY(__hyp_do_panic)
> ENDPROC(__hyp_do_panic)
>
> ENTRY(__hyp_panic)
> - /*
> - * '=kvm_host_cpu_state' is a host VA from the constant pool, it may
> - * not be accessible by this address from EL2, hyp_panic() converts
> - * it with kern_hyp_va() before use.
> - */
> - ldr x0, =kvm_host_cpu_state
> - mrs x1, tpidr_el2
> - add x0, x0, x1
> + get_host_ctxt x0, x1
> b hyp_panic
> ENDPROC(__hyp_panic)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index b991f85c1133..d1749fa0bfc3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static hyp_alternate_select(__hyp_call_panic,
> __hyp_call_panic_nvhe, __hyp_call_panic_vhe,
> ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
>
> -void __hyp_text __noreturn hyp_panic(struct kvm_cpu_context *__host_ctxt)
> +void __hyp_text __noreturn hyp_panic(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
>
> @@ -476,9 +476,6 @@ void __hyp_text __noreturn hyp_panic(struct kvm_cpu_context *__host_ctxt)
> u64 par = read_sysreg(par_el1);
>
> if (read_sysreg(vttbr_el2)) {
> - struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
> -
> - host_ctxt = kern_hyp_va(__host_ctxt);
> vcpu = host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu;
> __timer_disable_traps(vcpu);
> __deactivate_traps(vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> index 2c17afd2be96..43b7dd65e3e6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> @@ -189,3 +189,8 @@ void __hyp_text __sysreg32_restore_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (vcpu->arch.debug_flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY)
> write_sysreg(sysreg[DBGVCR32_EL2], dbgvcr32_el2);
> }
> +
> +void __hyp_text __kvm_set_tpidr_el2(u64 tpidr_el2)
> +{
> + asm("msr tpidr_el2, %0": : "r" (tpidr_el2));
The paranoid in me says that we'd want an ISB here if we can possibly
use tpidr_el2 on this path. If we had to manic, for example...
> +}
> --
> 2.14.2
>
The above notwithstanding,
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-21 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-15 21:02 [PATCH v4 00/40] Optimize KVM/ARM for VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 01/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Avoid vcpu_load for other vcpu ioctls than KVM_RUN Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 9:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-21 17:05 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 02/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Move vcpu_load call after kvm_vcpu_first_run_init Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 11:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-15 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 03/40] KVM: arm64: Avoid storing the vcpu pointer on the stack Christoffer Dall
2018-02-19 15:50 ` Julien Grall
2018-02-22 8:43 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 11:34 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2018-02-22 9:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 9:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 9:49 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-21 17:32 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-22 9:10 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 9:56 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-22 10:24 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 04/40] KVM: arm64: Rework hyp_panic for VHE and non-VHE Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:32 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 05/40] KVM: arm64: Move HCR_INT_OVERRIDE to default HCR_EL2 guest flag Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 06/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vcpu->arch.irq_lines Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 07/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Add kvm_vcpu_load_sysregs and kvm_vcpu_put_sysregs Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 08/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Introduce vcpu_el1_is_32bit Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 12:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 9:11 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:34 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 09/40] KVM: arm64: Move debug dirty flag calculation out of world switch Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:35 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 10/40] KVM: arm64: Slightly improve debug save/restore functions Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:39 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-21 17:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 8:05 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-24 18:32 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-24 20:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 11/40] KVM: arm64: Improve debug register save/restore flow Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:40 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 12/40] KVM: arm64: Factor out fault info population and gic workarounds Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:41 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 13/40] KVM: arm64: Introduce VHE-specific kvm_vcpu_run Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:43 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-21 18:18 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-22 9:16 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 14/40] KVM: arm64: Remove kern_hyp_va() use in VHE switch function Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 15/40] KVM: arm64: Don't deactivate VM on VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 16/40] KVM: arm64: Remove noop calls to timer save/restore from VHE switch Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:43 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 17/40] KVM: arm64: Move userspace system registers into separate function Christoffer Dall
2018-02-19 17:21 ` Julien Grall
2018-02-22 9:18 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 12:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 18/40] KVM: arm64: Rewrite sysreg alternatives to static keys Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:44 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 19/40] KVM: arm64: Introduce separate VHE/non-VHE sysreg save/restore functions Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 20/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Remove leftover comment from kvm_vcpu_run_vhe Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:47 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 21/40] KVM: arm64: Unify non-VHE host/guest sysreg save and restore functions Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 22/40] KVM: arm64: Don't save the host ELR_EL2 and SPSR_EL2 on VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:49 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 23/40] KVM: arm64: Change 32-bit handling of VM system registers Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 24/40] KVM: arm64: Rewrite system register accessors to read/write functions Christoffer Dall
2018-02-19 18:12 ` Julien Grall
2018-02-22 9:18 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 13:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 9:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 10:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 11:10 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 13:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 13:34 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-22 14:35 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 15:11 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-22 15:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 25/40] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework for accessing deferred sysregs Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 14:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 13:40 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-22 14:56 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 17:40 ` Julien Grall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 26/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Prepare to handle deferred save/restore of SPSR_EL1 Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 14:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 9:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 13:49 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 27/40] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle deferred save/restore of ELR_EL1 Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 15:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 13:51 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 28/40] KVM: arm64: Defer saving/restoring 64-bit sysregs to vcpu load/put on VHE Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 15:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-23 18:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 14:04 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-22 18:30 ` Julien Grall
2018-02-22 18:31 ` Julien Grall
2018-02-22 19:49 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 19:48 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 29/40] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle deferred save/restore of 32-bit registers Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 15:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 14:30 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-23 11:35 ` Julien Grall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 30/40] KVM: arm64: Defer saving/restoring 32-bit sysregs to vcpu load/put Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 16:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 18:15 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 14:35 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-22 14:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 31/40] KVM: arm64: Move common VHE/non-VHE trap config in separate functions Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 17:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 18:17 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-25 21:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 15:34 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-23 14:30 ` Julien Grall
2018-02-23 17:48 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-25 21:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 32/40] KVM: arm64: Directly call VHE and non-VHE FPSIMD enabled functions Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 18:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 15:38 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 33/40] KVM: arm64: Configure c15, PMU, and debug register traps on cpu load/put for VHE Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 18:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 18:57 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 15:51 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 34/40] KVM: arm64: Cleanup __activate_traps and __deactive_traps for VHE and non-VHE Christoffer Dall
2018-02-21 18:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 19:04 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 15:54 ` Andrew Jones
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 35/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vgic_elrsr Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 9:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-23 14:44 ` Julien Grall
2018-02-23 17:50 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 36/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle VGICv2 save/restore from the main VGIC code Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 37/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Move arm64-only vgic-v2-sr.c file to arm64 Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 12:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 14:37 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 38/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle VGICv3 save/restore from the main VGIC code on VHE Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 12:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 14:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 15:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 16:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 17:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 19:28 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 39/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Move VGIC APR save/restore to vgic put/load Christoffer Dall
2018-02-22 13:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 14:44 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-15 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 40/40] KVM: arm/arm64: Avoid VGICv3 save/restore on VHE with no IRQs Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86fu5ulgpc.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shihwei@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=tn@semihalf.com \
--cc=ynorov@caviumnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox