From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 567D832AABD; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 15:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785769271; cv=none; b=e2ktQHvLEJ/LeEwSsVo10Z6eFp/J2L09eygrBuO+BrQB2NXdXjWUtxhzkggs+Rm5AMRUornVqQ3RCXtnyhHESjltbRq23tNhCRorSTlLFx80jFYWTzKuzFc10Yxra2IgDtuNH+fAoDQRaejVkfp+rErig6b4Hg0AM6SrQ3GJylg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785769271; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HvNFWgtky/J8S9XuvaUSeL7E3qUaPi+Fl1YIEa08ONM=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TJwpMUvPIZ9yOGMa4RNgtt7NoluyqeS5G8jLY/0aBYyPrxvNUhYIf6JWt+j0GyHgsSdBKtkCBhNpB/qbE+gNyRYgFMSe2i2umc3keaJ+WY1eZ/IQ4dqNLCIlGzPP6C6k49+E2baCotxxbdE+LPj097dfN8aij/F10N/wtzfJVvw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=N+m1MKC0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="N+m1MKC0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 393A31F000E9; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 15:01:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785769270; bh=Qql+Sn0so9VH3FDlsm4xQxQlvxZLHhNzg0nkC68+mhg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=N+m1MKC0pP7b1NtYcGQkMMcOEGB6h8cWxBRkGaLic7ZigSUEph5FS9NB7uY9ehgoR M0IdlLhywEPm54kVG5/Adm9Q8zQT0DE/RAYN4yZda8bTbTW4iSrWV60he+ZuRD6C/D lR7HJCVpAZIho+zGqDv8D8AffkKw+ALZJ85ebyaNqK5mabePEpoiaREji0nUNqshZS y+ljOEOGK9dCHGXaN+SkQkSXmbEcSVHVdVN8/Ngnjy+V/b0ELFKy757VTSFCjj5BV/ 71FK83ypryw9z4f0V9ft82Y+dzw0BV2y2JF1klCGNElOf380Mgg98aleqS5i+NSh9r wZCJdBK1xzkCw== Received: from sofa.misterjones.org ([185.219.108.64] helo=goblin-girl.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wquA8-0000000Bows-0OK3; Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:01:08 +0000 Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:01:07 +0100 Message-ID: <86y0enb64s.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Steven Price Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , James Morse , Oliver Upton , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly , Alexandru Elisei , Christoffer Dall , Fuad Tabba , linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, Ganapatrao Kulkarni , Gavin Shan , Shanker Donthineni , Alper Gun , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Emi Kisanuki , Vishal Annapurve , WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 00/45] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM In-Reply-To: <20260803134403.80630-1-steven.price@arm.com> References: <20260803134403.80630-1-steven.price@arm.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/30.1 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 185.219.108.64 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: steven.price@arm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, tabba@google.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com, gshan@redhat.com, sdonthineni@nvidia.com, alpergun@google.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, fj0570is@fujitsu.com, vannapurve@google.com, WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false On Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:43:16 +0100, Steven Price wrote: > > This series is based on the guest_memfd in-place conversion v9 tree[1], > which is itself based on kvm-x86/next. It is also available as a git > repository: Well done. Series on top of another random series, based on a random tree. Unusable. Have you realised there are reasons why we (KVM/arm64) ask people to base their series on a *released* tag from Linus' tree? This means that Sashiko cannot, once again, provide any feedback on this series, as it fails to apply. Just to avoid any ambiguity: Sashiko reviews, as annoying as they are, are not optional. They are very much mandatory, and I wish I could turn back the clocks to run it on my own code... Running it on your own is not enough, because *I* want to see what the tool finds. Not to mention that non-Gemini runs of sashiko are much less interesting (unsurprisingly). M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.