From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vitaly Kuznetsov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: nVMX: Enlightened VMCS for Hyper-V on KVM Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 15:22:44 +0200 Message-ID: <871sbgaonv.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> References: <20180725163057.13948-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <4c221ed3-5de8-b9cf-663b-d31ce0834c12@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Roman Kagan , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" , Mohammed Gamal , Cathy Avery , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson , Liran Alon To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4c221ed3-5de8-b9cf-663b-d31ce0834c12@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:45:10 +0200") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 25/07/2018 18:30, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Changes since v2: >> - Rebase to the current kvm/queue. >> - Simplify clean fields check in prepare_vmcs02{,_full} and >> copy_enlightened_to_vmcs12() by resetting the clean fields mask in >> nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld() when we switch from one L2 guest >> to another [Paolo Bonzini] >> - Cope with the newly introduced vmx_get_nested_state() by returning >> -ENOTSUPP when eVMCS is in use. We'll do proper nested state save/restore >> later. > > Looks good, but we have to do something about live migration. Sure, I don't actually see any fundumental problems when eVMCS is in use, however, I'd like to enable migration when we know that it works so I was going to wait for your nested virtualization state migration series to land and gain Qemu support before starting to experiment. "One bite at a time". > Perhaps you can write a testcase analogous to the new state_test, that > tests eVMCS in general before we have support in QEMU. I'll take a look, thanks for the pointer! -- Vitaly