Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stefan Teodorescu <fane@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Zero reserved synic flags when delivering message to avoid stack leak
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 09:12:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874iggnijm.fsf@172.16.32.78> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826184449.814130-1-seanjc@google.com>

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:

> Ensure all reserved flags are zeroed when setting the msg_pending flag as
> part of SynIC message delivery, as setting only msg_pending can leak seven
> bits of kernel stack data to the guest.  E.g. gcc typically uses a
> bitwise-OR to set the msg_pending flag, without initializing the on-stack
> variable.
>
> Precisely zero the flags, e.g. as opposed to zeroing the entire structure,
> to make it somewhat more obvious that the flags *need* to be zeroed.  E.g.
> it would be quite easy to misread the initial read of guest memory and
> think that zeroing the entire structure is completely superfluous.
>
> Fixes: 3a0e7731724f ("x86: kvm: hyperv: simplify SynIC message delivery")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Stefan Teodorescu <fane@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index 604651cb2739..8d2669d8ef34 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -802,7 +802,9 @@ static int synic_deliver_msg(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_synic *synic, u32 sint,
>  		if (no_retry)
>  			return 0;
>  
> +		hv_hdr.message_flags.asu8 = 0;
>  		hv_hdr.message_flags.msg_pending = 1;
> +
>  		r = kvm_vcpu_write_guest_page(vcpu, msg_page_gfn,
>  					      &hv_hdr.message_flags,
>  					      msg_off +
>
> base-commit: 76671054f9a1ff6abb976583cd8da37650acdc97

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

(although, I kind of like the idea of zeroing the whole structure with a
comment that we don't read it as a whole from guest's memory too)

-- 
Vitaly


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-27  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-26 18:44 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Zero reserved synic flags when delivering message to avoid stack leak Sean Christopherson
2026-08-27  7:12 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2026-08-27 16:09   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874iggnijm.fsf@172.16.32.78 \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=fane@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox