* [PATCH] KVM: set_msr_mce: Permit guests to ignore single-bit ECC errors
@ 2022-05-21 8:15 Lev Kujawski
2022-05-23 17:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-23 19:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lev Kujawski @ 2022-05-21 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm; +Cc: Lev Kujawski
Certain guest operating systems (e.g., UNIXWARE) clear bit 0 of
MC1_CTL to ignore single-bit ECC data errors. Single-bit ECC data
errors are always correctable and thus are safe to ignore because they
are informational in nature rather than signaling a loss of data
integrity.
Prior to this patch, these guests would crash upon writing MC1_CTL,
with resultant error messages like the following:
error: kvm run failed Operation not permitted
EAX=fffffffe EBX=fffffffe ECX=00000404 EDX=ffffffff
ESI=ffffffff EDI=00000001 EBP=fffdaba4 ESP=fffdab20
EIP=c01333a5 EFL=00000246 [---Z-P-] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
ES =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
CS =0100 00000000 ffffffff 00c09b00 DPL=0 CS32 [-RA]
SS =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
DS =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
FS =0000 00000000 ffffffff 00c00000
GS =0000 00000000 ffffffff 00c00000
LDT=0118 c1026390 00000047 00008200 DPL=0 LDT
TR =0110 ffff5af0 00000067 00008b00 DPL=0 TSS32-busy
GDT= ffff5020 000002cf
IDT= ffff52f0 000007ff
CR0=8001003b CR2=00000000 CR3=0100a000 CR4=00000230
DR0=00000000 DR1=00000000 DR2=00000000 DR3=00000000
DR6=ffff0ff0 DR7=00000400
EFER=0000000000000000
Code=08 89 01 89 51 04 c3 8b 4c 24 08 8b 01 8b 51 04 8b 4c 24 04 <0f>
30 c3 f7 05 a4 6d ff ff 10 00 00 00 74 03 0f 31 c3 33 c0 33 d2 c3 8d
74 26 00 0f 31 c3
Signed-off-by: Lev Kujawski <lkujaw@member.fsf.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 4790f0d7d40b..128dca4e7bb7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3215,10 +3215,13 @@ static int set_msr_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
/* only 0 or all 1s can be written to IA32_MCi_CTL
* some Linux kernels though clear bit 10 in bank 4 to
* workaround a BIOS/GART TBL issue on AMD K8s, ignore
- * this to avoid an uncatched #GP in the guest
+ * this to avoid an uncatched #GP in the guest.
+ *
+ * UNIXWARE clears bit 0 of MC1_CTL to ignore
+ * correctable, single-bit ECC data errors.
*/
if ((offset & 0x3) == 0 &&
- data != 0 && (data | (1 << 10)) != ~(u64)0)
+ data != 0 && (data | (1 << 10) | 1) != ~(u64)0)
return -1;
/* MCi_STATUS */
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: set_msr_mce: Permit guests to ignore single-bit ECC errors
2022-05-21 8:15 [PATCH] KVM: set_msr_mce: Permit guests to ignore single-bit ECC errors Lev Kujawski
@ 2022-05-23 17:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-23 19:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-23 21:48 ` Lev Kujawski
2022-05-23 19:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2022-05-23 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lev Kujawski; +Cc: kvm
"KVM: x86:" for the shortlog scope.
On Sat, May 21, 2022, Lev Kujawski wrote:
> Certain guest operating systems (e.g., UNIXWARE) clear bit 0 of
> MC1_CTL to ignore single-bit ECC data errors.
Not that it really matters, but is this behavior documented anywhere? I've searched
a variety of SDMs, APMs, and PPRs, and can't find anything that documents this exact
behavior. I totally believe that some CPUs behave this way, but it'd be nice to
document exactly which generations of whose CPUs allow clearing bit zero.
> Single-bit ECC data errors are always correctable and thus are safe to ignore
> because they are informational in nature rather than signaling a loss of data
> integrity.
>
> Prior to this patch, these guests would crash upon writing MC1_CTL,
> with resultant error messages like the following:
>
> error: kvm run failed Operation not permitted
> EAX=fffffffe EBX=fffffffe ECX=00000404 EDX=ffffffff
> ESI=ffffffff EDI=00000001 EBP=fffdaba4 ESP=fffdab20
> EIP=c01333a5 EFL=00000246 [---Z-P-] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
> ES =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> CS =0100 00000000 ffffffff 00c09b00 DPL=0 CS32 [-RA]
> SS =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> DS =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> FS =0000 00000000 ffffffff 00c00000
> GS =0000 00000000 ffffffff 00c00000
> LDT=0118 c1026390 00000047 00008200 DPL=0 LDT
> TR =0110 ffff5af0 00000067 00008b00 DPL=0 TSS32-busy
> GDT= ffff5020 000002cf
> IDT= ffff52f0 000007ff
> CR0=8001003b CR2=00000000 CR3=0100a000 CR4=00000230
> DR0=00000000 DR1=00000000 DR2=00000000 DR3=00000000
> DR6=ffff0ff0 DR7=00000400
> EFER=0000000000000000
> Code=08 89 01 89 51 04 c3 8b 4c 24 08 8b 01 8b 51 04 8b 4c 24 04 <0f>
> 30 c3 f7 05 a4 6d ff ff 10 00 00 00 74 03 0f 31 c3 33 c0 33 d2 c3 8d
> 74 26 00 0f 31 c3
>
> Signed-off-by: Lev Kujawski <lkujaw@member.fsf.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 4790f0d7d40b..128dca4e7bb7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -3215,10 +3215,13 @@ static int set_msr_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> /* only 0 or all 1s can be written to IA32_MCi_CTL
> * some Linux kernels though clear bit 10 in bank 4 to
> * workaround a BIOS/GART TBL issue on AMD K8s, ignore
> - * this to avoid an uncatched #GP in the guest
> + * this to avoid an uncatched #GP in the guest.
> + *
> + * UNIXWARE clears bit 0 of MC1_CTL to ignore
> + * correctable, single-bit ECC data errors.
> */
> if ((offset & 0x3) == 0 &&
> - data != 0 && (data | (1 << 10)) != ~(u64)0)
> + data != 0 && (data | (1 << 10) | 1) != ~(u64)0)
> return -1;
If KVM injects a #GP like it's supposed to[*], will UNIXWARE eat the #GP and continue
on, or will it explode? If it continues on, I'd prefer to avoid more special casing in
KVM.
If it explodes, I think my preference would be to just drop the MCi_CTL checks
entirely. AFAICT, P4-based and P5-based Intel CPus, and all? AMD CPUs allow
setting/clearing arbitrary bits. The checks really aren't buying us anything,
and it seems like Intel retroactively defined the "architectural" behavior of
only 0s/1s.
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220512222716.4112548-2-seanjc@google.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: set_msr_mce: Permit guests to ignore single-bit ECC errors
2022-05-21 8:15 [PATCH] KVM: set_msr_mce: Permit guests to ignore single-bit ECC errors Lev Kujawski
2022-05-23 17:08 ` Sean Christopherson
@ 2022-05-23 19:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2022-05-23 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lev Kujawski, kvm
On 5/21/22 10:15, Lev Kujawski wrote:
> Certain guest operating systems (e.g., UNIXWARE) clear bit 0 of
> MC1_CTL to ignore single-bit ECC data errors. Single-bit ECC data
> errors are always correctable and thus are safe to ignore because they
> are informational in nature rather than signaling a loss of data
> integrity.
>
> Prior to this patch, these guests would crash upon writing MC1_CTL,
> with resultant error messages like the following:
>
> error: kvm run failed Operation not permitted
> EAX=fffffffe EBX=fffffffe ECX=00000404 EDX=ffffffff
> ESI=ffffffff EDI=00000001 EBP=fffdaba4 ESP=fffdab20
> EIP=c01333a5 EFL=00000246 [---Z-P-] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
> ES =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> CS =0100 00000000 ffffffff 00c09b00 DPL=0 CS32 [-RA]
> SS =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> DS =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> FS =0000 00000000 ffffffff 00c00000
> GS =0000 00000000 ffffffff 00c00000
> LDT=0118 c1026390 00000047 00008200 DPL=0 LDT
> TR =0110 ffff5af0 00000067 00008b00 DPL=0 TSS32-busy
> GDT= ffff5020 000002cf
> IDT= ffff52f0 000007ff
> CR0=8001003b CR2=00000000 CR3=0100a000 CR4=00000230
> DR0=00000000 DR1=00000000 DR2=00000000 DR3=00000000
> DR6=ffff0ff0 DR7=00000400
> EFER=0000000000000000
> Code=08 89 01 89 51 04 c3 8b 4c 24 08 8b 01 8b 51 04 8b 4c 24 04 <0f>
> 30 c3 f7 05 a4 6d ff ff 10 00 00 00 74 03 0f 31 c3 33 c0 33 d2 c3 8d
> 74 26 00 0f 31 c3
>
> Signed-off-by: Lev Kujawski <lkujaw@member.fsf.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 4790f0d7d40b..128dca4e7bb7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -3215,10 +3215,13 @@ static int set_msr_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> /* only 0 or all 1s can be written to IA32_MCi_CTL
> * some Linux kernels though clear bit 10 in bank 4 to
> * workaround a BIOS/GART TBL issue on AMD K8s, ignore
> - * this to avoid an uncatched #GP in the guest
> + * this to avoid an uncatched #GP in the guest.
> + *
> + * UNIXWARE clears bit 0 of MC1_CTL to ignore
> + * correctable, single-bit ECC data errors.
> */
> if ((offset & 0x3) == 0 &&
> - data != 0 && (data | (1 << 10)) != ~(u64)0)
> + data != 0 && (data | (1 << 10) | 1) != ~(u64)0)
> return -1;
>
> /* MCi_STATUS */
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: set_msr_mce: Permit guests to ignore single-bit ECC errors
2022-05-23 17:08 ` Sean Christopherson
@ 2022-05-23 19:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-23 21:48 ` Lev Kujawski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2022-05-23 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson, Lev Kujawski; +Cc: kvm
On 5/23/22 19:08, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> If KVM injects a #GP like it's supposed to[*], will UNIXWARE eat the #GP and continue
> on, or will it explode? If it continues on, I'd prefer to avoid more special casing in
> KVM.
>
> If it explodes, I think my preference would be to just drop the MCi_CTL checks
> entirely. AFAICT, P4-based and P5-based Intel CPus, and all? AMD CPUs allow
> setting/clearing arbitrary bits. The checks really aren't buying us anything,
> and it seems like Intel retroactively defined the "architectural" behavior of
> only 0s/1s.
I'm always a bit worried about removing #GP behavior (just like adding
it of course) because sometimes it is used by OSes to detect specific
non-architectural processor behavior.
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: set_msr_mce: Permit guests to ignore single-bit ECC errors
2022-05-23 17:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-23 19:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2022-05-23 21:48 ` Lev Kujawski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lev Kujawski @ 2022-05-23 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson; +Cc: kvm, lkujaw
Sean Christopherson writes:
> "KVM: x86:" for the shortlog scope.
>
> On Sat, May 21, 2022, Lev Kujawski wrote:
>> Certain guest operating systems (e.g., UNIXWARE) clear bit 0 of
>> MC1_CTL to ignore single-bit ECC data errors.
>
> Not that it really matters, but is this behavior documented anywhere? I've searched
> a variety of SDMs, APMs, and PPRs, and can't find anything that documents this exact
> behavior. I totally believe that some CPUs behave this way, but it'd be nice to
> document exactly which generations of whose CPUs allow clearing bit zero.
Intel's coverage of IA32_MC1_CTL appears to be proprietary (perhaps
Appendix H material), but AMD helpfully documented it on page 204 of
their BIOS and Kernel Developer's Guide:
https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/26094.PDF
I experimentally determined that UNIXWARE writes MC1_CTL on QEMU models
"pentium2" or newer, but my guess is that this functionality was
actually introduced with the Pentium Pro.
>> Single-bit ECC data errors are always correctable and thus are safe to ignore
>> because they are informational in nature rather than signaling a loss of data
>> integrity.
>>
>> Prior to this patch, these guests would crash upon writing MC1_CTL,
>> with resultant error messages like the following:
>>
>> error: kvm run failed Operation not permitted
>> EAX=fffffffe EBX=fffffffe ECX=00000404 EDX=ffffffff
>> ESI=ffffffff EDI=00000001 EBP=fffdaba4 ESP=fffdab20
>> EIP=c01333a5 EFL=00000246 [---Z-P-] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
>> ES =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
>> CS =0100 00000000 ffffffff 00c09b00 DPL=0 CS32 [-RA]
>> SS =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
>> DS =0108 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
>> FS =0000 00000000 ffffffff 00c00000
>> GS =0000 00000000 ffffffff 00c00000
>> LDT=0118 c1026390 00000047 00008200 DPL=0 LDT
>> TR =0110 ffff5af0 00000067 00008b00 DPL=0 TSS32-busy
>> GDT= ffff5020 000002cf
>> IDT= ffff52f0 000007ff
>> CR0=8001003b CR2=00000000 CR3=0100a000 CR4=00000230
>> DR0=00000000 DR1=00000000 DR2=00000000 DR3=00000000
>> DR6=ffff0ff0 DR7=00000400
>> EFER=0000000000000000
>> Code=08 89 01 89 51 04 c3 8b 4c 24 08 8b 01 8b 51 04 8b 4c 24 04 <0f>
>> 30 c3 f7 05 a4 6d ff ff 10 00 00 00 74 03 0f 31 c3 33 c0 33 d2 c3 8d
>> 74 26 00 0f 31 c3
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lev Kujawski <lkujaw@member.fsf.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 4790f0d7d40b..128dca4e7bb7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -3215,10 +3215,13 @@ static int set_msr_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>> /* only 0 or all 1s can be written to IA32_MCi_CTL
>> * some Linux kernels though clear bit 10 in bank 4 to
>> * workaround a BIOS/GART TBL issue on AMD K8s, ignore
>> - * this to avoid an uncatched #GP in the guest
>> + * this to avoid an uncatched #GP in the guest.
>> + *
>> + * UNIXWARE clears bit 0 of MC1_CTL to ignore
>> + * correctable, single-bit ECC data errors.
>> */
>> if ((offset & 0x3) == 0 &&
>> - data != 0 && (data | (1 << 10)) != ~(u64)0)
>> + data != 0 && (data | (1 << 10) | 1) != ~(u64)0)
>> return -1;
>
> If KVM injects a #GP like it's supposed to[*], will UNIXWARE eat the #GP and continue
> on, or will it explode? If it continues on, I'd prefer to avoid more special casing in
> KVM.
>
> If it explodes, I think my preference would be to just drop the MCi_CTL checks
> entirely. AFAICT, P4-based and P5-based Intel CPus, and all? AMD CPUs allow
> setting/clearing arbitrary bits. The checks really aren't buying us anything,
> and it seems like Intel retroactively defined the "architectural" behavior of
> only 0s/1s.
>
> [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220512222716.4112548-2-seanjc@google.com
Unfortunately, I cannot say if the UNIXWARE kernel would panic because
QEMU enters a STOP state from which attempts to continue are met with
"Error: Resetting the Virtual Machine is required."
Thanks for the feedback, Lev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-23 21:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-21 8:15 [PATCH] KVM: set_msr_mce: Permit guests to ignore single-bit ECC errors Lev Kujawski
2022-05-23 17:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-23 19:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-23 21:48 ` Lev Kujawski
2022-05-23 19:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox