From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4261C2BA19 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E410206D5 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="MiO6kYWp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390552AbgDNO0M (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:26:12 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:42680 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390544AbgDNO0J (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:26:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1586874367; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uSEGx3gNn1oGf/i6GkkhJSWUv9DBqbvzJo4hv43gN+I=; b=MiO6kYWpZd39GQL673Mv2f46lY7jJcd6duW2hrO8ONp1egGrckndauvYXd3L3dC7yzOBhd iLPLPLwxmMqqb49mCvwMn6TNcXlZgWScFlR/SfMXeMf/5tiwuxWaRbDO2GpMKMlQr6BiUF BAhI1o8KO8ELBCYGgdzRdz9947oPB4U= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-282-Lqh4IpKiOma_mL_JJHsnng-1; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:26:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Lqh4IpKiOma_mL_JJHsnng-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id g6so8755095wru.8 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:26:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=uSEGx3gNn1oGf/i6GkkhJSWUv9DBqbvzJo4hv43gN+I=; b=r8BnWPfsl67EnpyAbX1U5JJXoqdrpzHY0BYJN44D4gOzhsrJatRwfULUuHdiN0BAn0 vVk2SNEVajMxd6txC/Tkpco6wnZ6Px+0n8YOI523eYUAp8o06huUXeTFeYzgzFGir7SO icwFBddTMqrZmTvCaWUulfVkmYVGZSx1Dr0aQ/lahurbDoVChxkMYZn0ckh9HOHp2G57 uY5jMUipPAqNVx2NsYgA5Vp18mPzQrTeox/JV7pVJT7t0eUn0wnodszspQoZ3nMJiAjN RsYlYRGvTlwBBvrfP0rq/Qs93NCCdRzryQrhroUzZ2mwGWrSF7a3C+bXr++zAL47xzRq mt2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY3F0kd4THIY6iPzd2En2FShiC7icgabe3D4OUIZ6jlr4ipPbEe E0Sjs8OkghfngNnOQZjeBhUPVPrLqhvaSvoL6UqW1qrxRQxMPsNa/crRKFlJD9YYmh7RRdYIX6j jC7S+9Yom9fYn X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4409:: with SMTP id r9mr102726wma.165.1586874363879; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJqgbBq9xhT1LszvRzgjgWUmQyELrXGBlfZ5uFizKdfdTJlTiXTCHR6m1nvQHHbl9Aa0nzYPg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4409:: with SMTP id r9mr102702wma.165.1586874363651; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vitty.brq.redhat.com (g-server-2.ign.cz. [91.219.240.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v10sm7145993wrq.45.2020.04.14.07.26.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: Tianjia Zhang Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Optimize kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run function In-Reply-To: <20200413034523.110548-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20200413034523.110548-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:26:01 +0200 Message-ID: <875ze2ywhy.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Tianjia Zhang writes: > kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() is only called in the file kvm_main.c, > where vcpu->run is the kvm_run parameter, so it has been replaced. > > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang > --- > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++++---- > virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > index 3bf2ecafd027..70e3f4abbd4d 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -8726,18 +8726,18 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run) > r = -EAGAIN; > if (signal_pending(current)) { > r = -EINTR; > - vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR; > + kvm_run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR; I have a more generic question: why do we need to pass 'kvm_run' to kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() if it can be extracted from 'struct kvm_vcpu'? The only call site looks like virt/kvm/kvm_main.c: r = kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(vcpu, vcpu->run); > ++vcpu->stat.signal_exits; > } > goto out; > } > > - if (vcpu->run->kvm_valid_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_X86_VALID_FIELDS) { > + if (kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_X86_VALID_FIELDS) { > r = -EINVAL; > goto out; > } > > - if (vcpu->run->kvm_dirty_regs) { > + if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs) { > r = sync_regs(vcpu); > if (r != 0) > goto out; > @@ -8767,7 +8767,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run) > > out: > kvm_put_guest_fpu(vcpu); > - if (vcpu->run->kvm_valid_regs) > + if (kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs) > store_regs(vcpu); > post_kvm_run_save(vcpu); > kvm_sigset_deactivate(vcpu); > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > index 48d0ec44ad77..ab9d7966a4c8 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) > return ret; > > if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO) { > - ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, vcpu->run); > + ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, run); > if (ret) > return ret; > } -- Vitaly