From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, bgardon@google.com, shuah@kernel.org,
andrew.jones@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, dmatlack@google.com,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, peterx@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: Move declaration of kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size() to kvm_dirty_ring.h
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 20:12:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d1sio31.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220922003214.276736-3-gshan@redhat.com>
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:32:10 +0100,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Not all architectures like ARM64 need to override the function. Move
> its declaration to kvm_dirty_ring.h to avoid the following compiling
> warning on ARM64 when the feature is enabled.
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c:14:12: \
> warning: no previous prototype for 'kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size' \
> [-Wmissing-prototypes] \
> int __weak kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size(void)
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 --
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 2c96c43c313a..4c0fd517282b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -2082,8 +2082,6 @@ static inline int kvm_cpu_get_apicid(int mps_cpu)
> #define GET_SMSTATE(type, buf, offset) \
> (*(type *)((buf) + (offset) - 0x7e00))
>
> -int kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size(void);
> -
> int memslot_rmap_alloc(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned long npages);
>
> #define KVM_CLOCK_VALID_FLAGS \
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index e418ef3ecfcb..b3eb6a3627ec 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -1349,10 +1349,12 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
> kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(kvm, slot, gfn_offset, mask);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_DIRTY_RING
I think you can drop the ifdeffery, as HAVE_KVM_DIRTY_RING is
unconditionally selected by the arch Kconfig.
> int kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size(void)
> {
> return kvm_x86_ops.cpu_dirty_log_size;
> }
> +#endif
>
> bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn,
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h b/include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h
> index 906f899813dc..8c6755981c9b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_dirty_ring_soft_full(struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring)
>
> #else /* CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_DIRTY_RING */
>
> +int kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size(void);
> u32 kvm_dirty_ring_get_rsvd_entries(void);
> int kvm_dirty_ring_alloc(struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring, int index, u32 size);
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-24 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-22 0:32 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: arm64: Enable ring-based dirty memory tracking Gavin Shan
2022-09-22 0:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_REQ_RING_SOFT_FULL Gavin Shan
2022-09-22 0:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: Move declaration of kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size() to kvm_dirty_ring.h Gavin Shan
2022-09-24 19:12 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-09-25 23:09 ` Gavin Shan
2022-09-22 0:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: arm64: Enable ring-based dirty memory tracking Gavin Shan
2022-09-24 20:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-25 23:13 ` Gavin Shan
2022-09-22 0:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: selftests: Use host page size to map ring buffer in dirty_log_test Gavin Shan
2022-09-22 0:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: selftests: Clear dirty ring states between two modes " Gavin Shan
2022-09-22 0:32 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: selftests: Automate choosing dirty ring size " Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877d1sio31.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenyzha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox