From: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests RFC] s390x: Add Protected VM support
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 14:30:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dxo6i6v.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad0d5c9d-bde2-2143-0440-d47d6e28bb29@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:03 PM +0200, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 5/6/20 2:46 PM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
>> Add support for Protected Virtual Machine (PVM) tests. For starting a
>> PVM guest we must be able to generate a PVM image by using the
>> `genprotimg` tool from the s390-tools collection. This requires the
>> ability to pass a machine-specific host-key document, so the option
>> `--host-key-document` is added to the configure script.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
[…snip…]
>> [intercept]
>> file = intercept.elf
>> +pv_support = 1
>
> So, let's do this discussion once more:
> Why would we need a opt-in for something which works on all our current
> tests? I'd much rather have a opt-out or just a bail-out when running
> the test like I already implemented for the storage key related
> tests...
>
> I don't see any benefit for this right now other than forcing me to add
> another line to this file that was not needed before..
>
Okay. So shall I add an option ’pv_not_supported’? Or simply assume that
the actual test cases will handle it?
--
Kind regards / Beste Grüße
Marc Hartmayer
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-07 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 12:46 [kvm-unit-tests RFC] s390x: Add Protected VM support Marc Hartmayer
2020-05-06 13:50 ` Andrew Jones
2020-05-07 13:14 ` Marc Hartmayer
2020-05-07 13:40 ` Marc Hartmayer
2020-05-06 14:03 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-06 14:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-06 14:26 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-07 12:30 ` Marc Hartmayer [this message]
2020-05-07 12:34 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dxo6i6v.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox