From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vitaly Kuznetsov Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] KVM: x86: hyperv: implement PV IPI send hypercalls Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 18:20:36 +0200 Message-ID: <877ej1fxkb.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> References: <20180926170259.29796-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20180926170259.29796-8-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20180927110711.GE4186@rkaganb.sw.ru> <51ff55e0-9d8d-73be-e0e7-f8580bc0206e@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" , Mohammed Gamal , Cathy Avery , Wanpeng Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Bonzini , Roman Kagan Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51ff55e0-9d8d-73be-e0e7-f8580bc0206e@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 27/09/2018 13:07, Roman Kagan wrote: ... >> >> I must say that now it looks even more tempting to follow the same >> pattern as your kvm_hv_flush_tlb: define a function that would call >> kvm_apic_set_irq() on all vcpus in a mask (optimizing the all-set case >> with a NULL mask), and make kvm_hv_send_ipi perform the same hv_vp_set >> -> vcpu_mask transformation followed by calling into that function. > > > It would perhaps be cleaner, but really kvm_apic_set_irq is as efficient > as it can be, since it takes the destination vcpu directly. > > The code duplication for walking the sparse set is a bit ugly, perhaps > that could be changed to use an iterator macro. I actually like Roman's suggestion on how to re-write kvm_hv_flush_tlb() and I also agree that it would be easier for future readers if we write kvm_hv_send_ipi() in a similar way. Actually, I already have v7 in my stash, will be sending it out shortly. -- Vitaly