From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rusty Russell <rusty.russell@linaro.org>
Subject: [RFC 0/5] Making KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG generic.
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:07:01 +0930
Message-ID: <877gsia8rm.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, "kvm-devel" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: "Avi Kivity" <avi@redhat.com>,
	"Christoffer Dall" <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com>,
	"Alexander Graf" <agraf@suse.de>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:35927 "EHLO ozlabs.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750973Ab2H1XhT (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:37:19 -0400
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Hi all,

        This compiles, completely untested, but it's my attempt to give
Avi (and Alexander) what he asked for in a generic register accessor.

Mingled in these patches is the conversion of the latest KVM ARM code,
which is the first proposed user: by the end, we use these accessors for
*every* register and piece of state.

GET_MULTI/SET_MULTI is an obvious extension which is not yet
implemented.

Comments please!
Rusty.