From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
thuth@redhat.com, nilal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v1] x86: Fix the logical destination mode test
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:01:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878siyyxng.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4993e419-5eef-46ba-5dd0-e35c7103190b@redhat.com>
Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com> writes:
> On 3/10/20 10:03 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 07:15:50PM -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
>>> There are following issues with the ioapic logical destination mode test:
>>>
>>> - A race condition that is triggered when the interrupt handler
>>> ioapic_isr_86() is called at the same time by multiple vCPUs. Due to this
>>> the g_isr_86 is not correctly incremented. To prevent this a spinlock is
>>> added around ‘g_isr_86++’.
>>>
>>> - On older QEMU versions initial x2APIC ID is not set, that is why
>>> the local APIC IDs of each vCPUs are not configured. Hence the logical
>>> destination mode test fails/hangs. Adding ‘+x2apic’ to the qemu -cpu params
>>> ensures that the local APICs are configured every time, irrespective of the
>>> QEMU version.
>>>
>>> - With ‘-machine kernel_irqchip=split’ included in the ioapic test
>>> test_ioapic_self_reconfigure() always fails and somehow leads to a state where
>>> after submitting IOAPIC fixed delivery - logical destination mode request we
>>> never receive an interrupt back. For now, the physical and logical destination
>>> mode tests are moved above test_ioapic_self_reconfigure().
>>>
>>> Fixes: b2a1ee7e ("kvm-unit-test: x86: ioapic: Test physical and logical destination mode")
>>> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
>> Looks good to me.
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to follow up and see if there are any more suggestions for me to
> improve this patch before it can be merged.
>
>
>>
>>> ---
>>> x86/ioapic.c | 11 +++++++----
>>> x86/unittests.cfg | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/x86/ioapic.c b/x86/ioapic.c
>>> index 742c711..3106531 100644
>>> --- a/x86/ioapic.c
>>> +++ b/x86/ioapic.c
>>> @@ -432,10 +432,13 @@ static void test_ioapic_physical_destination_mode(void)
>>> }
>>>
>>> static volatile int g_isr_86;
>>> +struct spinlock ioapic_lock;
>>>
>>> static void ioapic_isr_86(isr_regs_t *regs)
>>> {
>>> + spin_lock(&ioapic_lock);
>>> ++g_isr_86;
>>> + spin_unlock(&ioapic_lock);
>>> set_irq_line(0x0e, 0);
>>> eoi();
>>> }
>>> @@ -501,6 +504,10 @@ int main(void)
>>> test_ioapic_level_tmr(true);
>>> test_ioapic_edge_tmr(true);
>>>
>>> + test_ioapic_physical_destination_mode();
I just found out that this particular change causes 'ioapic-split' test
to hang reliably:
# ./run_tests.sh ioapic-split
FAIL ioapic-split (timeout; duration=90s)
PASS ioapic (26 tests)
unlike 'ioapic' test we run it with '-smp 1' and
'test_ioapic_physical_destination_mode' requires > 1 CPU to work AFAICT.
Why do we move it from under 'if (cpu_count() > 1)' ?
Also, this patch could've been split.
>>> + if (cpu_count() > 3)
>>> + test_ioapic_logical_destination_mode();
>>> +
>>> if (cpu_count() > 1) {
>>> test_ioapic_edge_tmr_smp(false);
>>> test_ioapic_level_tmr_smp(false);
>>> @@ -508,11 +515,7 @@ int main(void)
>>> test_ioapic_edge_tmr_smp(true);
>>>
>>> test_ioapic_self_reconfigure();
>>> - test_ioapic_physical_destination_mode();
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (cpu_count() > 3)
>>> - test_ioapic_logical_destination_mode();
>>> -
>>> return report_summary();
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/x86/unittests.cfg b/x86/unittests.cfg
>>> index f2401eb..d658bc8 100644
>>> --- a/x86/unittests.cfg
>>> +++ b/x86/unittests.cfg
>>> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ timeout = 30
>>> [ioapic]
>>> file = ioapic.flat
>>> smp = 4
>>> -extra_params = -cpu qemu64
>>> +extra_params = -cpu qemu64,+x2apic
>>> arch = x86_64
>>>
>>> [cmpxchg8b]
>>> --
>>> 1.8.3.1
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-14 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1583795750-33197-1-git-send-email-nitesh@redhat.com>
2020-03-09 23:25 ` [Patch v1] x86: Fix the logical destination mode test Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-03-10 14:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-16 22:27 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-03-17 15:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-14 14:01 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2020-04-14 15:14 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-04-14 15:30 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-04-14 15:34 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-04-14 16:11 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-04-14 16:27 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878siyyxng.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nilal@redhat.com \
--cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox