From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Avoid retpoline on ->page_fault() with TDP
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 10:29:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878sleg2z7.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200206221434.23790-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> writes:
> Wrap calls to ->page_fault() with a small shim to directly invoke the
> TDP fault handler when the kernel is using retpolines and TDP is being
> used. Denote the TDP fault handler by nullifying mmu->page_fault, and
> annotate the TDP path as likely to coerce the compiler into preferring
> the TDP path.
>
> Rename tdp_page_fault() to kvm_tdp_page_fault() as it's exposed outside
> of mmu.c to allow inlining the shim.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> ---
Out of pure curiosity, if we do something like
if (vcpu->arch.mmu->page_fault == tdp_page_fault)
tdp_page_fault(...)
else if (vcpu->arch.mmu->page_fault == nonpaging_page_fault)
nonpaging_page_fault(...)
...
we also defeat the retpoline, right? Should we use this technique
... everywhere? :-)
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-07 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 22:14 [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Avoid retpoline on ->page_fault() with TDP Sean Christopherson
2020-02-07 9:29 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2020-02-07 15:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-07 16:15 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-12 11:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-12 16:22 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878sleg2z7.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).