From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47CAC10F27 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F872468F for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="d66rXwRp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726283AbgCJLUp (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:20:45 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:21184 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725937AbgCJLUn (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:20:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583839242; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type; bh=arw5L5YsoJ87khZVMFIrLcsKvVPIlQcfxYIOv80kSBg=; b=d66rXwRpXBzA5RPScNFObQshSHgIyJljAfwA02V352ZH8eGxpBQ/f5BNCfGgSAY3vyhhOX SVRvX01U2g7b37JZiJBYuyXhN919LyzLwqbtdeaIXKyElFKHAoDnGAO5oRlPCANpe7AImr aIQquNKQ9YLGWUuQp6YlJQ7yvE3uaII= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-221-jfRFySz4PDiWwTidYnC3Bg-1; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:20:40 -0400 X-MC-Unique: jfRFySz4PDiWwTidYnC3Bg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2EAA18FF686; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-72.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.72]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4652360BF3; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:20:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela To: kvm-devel , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: KVM call today 2020-03-10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:20:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87a74ozcam.fsf@secure.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi Today is a call becasue there are topics, in case you missed. Notice that this call is in USA time, so if you are not there, it is inside possiblity that it is one hour sooner that you are used to. See the calendar. * Clarify the feedback on the latest revision of multi-process QEMU patches concerning: - Command-line: It's not clear what's the preferred approach to pass command-line parameters for the remote process. We are wondering if it's OK to accept the command-line parameters for the remote as a single string, or if it should be on multiple lines? - Refactoring migration related code: We realize that some of the modules we have built into the remote process (such as block and migration) compile more code than is required by the remote process. Ideally, we could refactor them to utilize just the pieces of code needed. However, this problem of refactoring has a larger scope. Could this be addressed in later projects? Call details: By popular demand, a google calendar public entry with it https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=dG9iMXRqcXAzN3Y4ZXZwNzRoMHE4a3BqcXNAZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5kYXIuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbQ (Let me know if you have any problems with the calendar entry. I just gave up about getting right at the same time CEST, CET, EDT and DST). If you need phone number details, contact me privately Thanks, Juan.