From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, jmattson@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 0/8]: x86: vmx: Test INIT processing in various CPU VMX states
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:08:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a7b09y5g.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190919125211.18152-1-liran.alon@oracle.com>
Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series aims to add a vmx test to verify the functionality
> introduced by KVM commit:
> 4b9852f4f389 ("KVM: x86: Fix INIT signal handling in various CPU states")
>
> The test verifies the following functionality:
> 1) An INIT signal received when CPU is in VMX operation
> is latched until it exits VMX operation.
> 2) If there is an INIT signal pending when CPU is in
> VMX non-root mode, it result in VMExit with (reason == 3).
> 3) Exit from VMX non-root mode on VMExit do not clear
> pending INIT signal in LAPIC.
> 4) When CPU exits VMX operation, pending INIT signal in
> LAPIC is processed.
>
> In order to write such a complex test, the vmx tests framework was
> enhanced to support using VMX in non BSP CPUs. This enhancement is
> implemented in patches 1-7. The test itself is implemented at patch 8.
> This enhancement to the vmx tests framework is a bit hackish, but
> I believe it's OK because this functionality is rarely required by
> other VMX tests.
>
Tested-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Thanks!
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-19 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-19 12:52 [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 0/8]: x86: vmx: Test INIT processing in various CPU VMX states Liran Alon
2019-09-19 12:52 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 1/8] x86: vmx: Refactor init of VMX caps to separate function Liran Alon
2019-09-19 12:52 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 2/8] x86: vmx: Prepare init_vmx() for VMX support on AP CPUs Liran Alon
2019-09-19 12:52 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 3/8] x86: vmx: Expose vmx_init() to be used " Liran Alon
2019-09-19 12:52 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 4/8] x86: vmx: Support VMXON on AP CPUs VMX region Liran Alon
2019-09-19 12:52 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 5/8] x86: vmx: Use MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL bits names Liran Alon
2019-09-19 12:52 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 6/8] x86: vmx: Expose util to enable VMX in MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL Liran Alon
2019-09-19 12:52 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 7/8] x86: vmx: Allow tests to hand-over test-vmcs between CPUs Liran Alon
2019-09-19 12:52 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 8/8] x86: vmx: Test INIT processing during various CPU VMX states Liran Alon
2019-09-19 14:08 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2019-09-24 15:34 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 0/8]: x86: vmx: Test INIT processing in " Liran Alon
2019-09-24 15:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 23:57 ` Liran Alon
2019-09-26 8:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-30 23:02 ` Nadav Amit
2019-10-01 0:48 ` Liran Alon
2019-10-01 1:14 ` Nadav Amit
2019-10-01 1:23 ` Liran Alon
2019-10-01 1:29 ` Nadav Amit
2019-10-01 18:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-01 23:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-01 23:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-01 23:37 ` Nadav Amit
2019-10-02 0:10 ` Liran Alon
2019-10-02 0:19 ` Liran Alon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a7b09y5g.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox