From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-spec: Fix wrong bit number of device status Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:05:26 +0930 Message-ID: <87boy9gqpt.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1307451139-20613-1-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com> <20110607130942.GA16234@t400> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Amos Kong Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:60751 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751164Ab1FHAqB (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:46:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110607130942.GA16234@t400> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:09:42 +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > qemu-kvm/hw/virtio_config.h: > #define VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE 1 > #define VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER 2 > #define VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK 4 > #define VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED 0x80 > > virtio-spec: > ACKNOWLEDGE(1) : > DRIVER(2) : > DRIVER_OK(3) : > FAILED(128) : > > The spec refers to bit numbers and the headers use absolute numbers, > they are not consistent. > > it shoule be 'FAILED(8)'. > 2^(8-1) = 128 > > Changes from V1: > - Fix wrong patch body > > Signed-off-by: Amos Kong Thanks, applied! Rusty.