From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:54:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2l4j272.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> References: <877gbdgce4.fsf@elfo.elfo> <52A70B10.7020408@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel qemu-devel , KVM devel mailing list , Anthony Liguori To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12590 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752529Ab3LJMzG (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:55:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <52A70B10.7020408@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:37:36 +0100") Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Paolo Bonzini writes: > Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto: >> >> Hi >> >> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering. > > May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here: what happened to > acknowledgement emails from the patches script? > > Also, Anthony, it looks like you're still adjusting to the new job. If > you need help with anything, I guess today's call could be a good place > to discuss it. > > And someone needs to send out the email saying that 1.7.0 is out and > that the next version will be 2.0! Speaking of sending out e-mail: did I miss the promised followup to the key signing party?