From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:47:39 +1030 Message-ID: <87d3byfev0.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <87pqfzgy6p.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1323358657.32487.9.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization To: Sasha Levin Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1323358657.32487.9.camel@lappy> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:37:37 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > Which leads me to the question: Are MMIO vs MMIO reads/writes not > ordered? That seems really odd, especially being repeatable. BTW, that's an address, not a pfn now. Cheers, Rusty.