From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:10:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87eisp1gx2.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> References: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> <1247128021.22231.1.camel@blaa> <4A55F150.3020803@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Anthony Liguori , "qemu-devel\@nongnu.org" , kvm-devel To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:43673 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753342AbZGJBLC (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:11:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A55F150.3020803@codemonkey.ws> (Anthony Liguori's message of "Thu\, 09 Jul 2009 08\:32\:00 -0500") Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Anthony Liguori writes: > Mark McLoughlin wrote: >> Hi Anthony, >> >> On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 18:57 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> It's getting to be about the time to start thinking about the >>> 0.11.0 release. 0.10.0 was released on March 2nd so following with >>> the 6 month release cycle, that would put 0.11.0 at September 2nd. >>> >>> Based on the experiences with the stable releases, here's what I'd >>> recommend: >>> >>> o On July 15th, fork master -> stable-0.11 >>> >> >> Are you still planning on creating the 0.11 branch next week? >> > > That's the plan although I need to make sure that all outstanding > patches have been given adequate review before hand. I want to give > any patch that has been posted so far a reasonable chance to make it > into 0.11. If I can get through the backlog today, then we'll stay on > schedule. Either way, there will be plenty of warning on the ML and > opportunity for people to make suggestions. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori Any hope that -device can make the cut?