From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CEDCDB474 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231302AbjJPPbJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:31:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60610 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232833AbjJPPbI (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:31:08 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA9D6EA for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 08:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1697470219; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CRf3fYGKsTrlOhUDvR5Nm0aYucqIml+Eu+5HAJHgZQY=; b=H73VZ51BccaGQ/qRLpXcXLhcJiXy2EW70Nw9b23PRaAjXSnBOOj9aIe9CVtMHCcV5AECeF /c4NrYpv6Y3rRzMLat9/9EUTsKLQ7I/+qKzZY9gvQvqhnGeJlba/+8dYaeKTtmjOsvCtEK Xjfx+b0u1wsKeaxsDULgHwIHgi8YaLE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-459-5rnxzrkYOMSSC8X6SHVcYg-1; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:30:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5rnxzrkYOMSSC8X6SHVcYg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A50881B15E; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.195.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7448B492BFA; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:30:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: Oliver Upton , kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Jing Zhang , Zenghui Yu , Suzuki K Poulose , James Morse , Marc Zyngier , Paolo Bonzini , Adrian Hunter , Ian Rogers , Namhyung Kim , Jiri Olsa , Alexander Shishkin , Mark Rutland , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Oliver Upton Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test for setting ID register from usersapce In-Reply-To: <20231011195740.3349631-6-oliver.upton@linux.dev> Organization: "Red Hat GmbH, Sitz: Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 12, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=BCnchen=2C?= HRB 153243, =?utf-8?Q?Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer=3A?= Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross" References: <20231011195740.3349631-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> <20231011195740.3349631-6-oliver.upton@linux.dev> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.37 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:30:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87fs2aegap.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 11 2023, Oliver Upton wrote: > From: Jing Zhang > > Add tests to verify setting ID registers from userspace is handled > correctly by KVM. Also add a test case to use ioctl > KVM_ARM_GET_REG_WRITABLE_MASKS to get writable masks. > > Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + > .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/set_id_regs.c | 479 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 480 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/set_id_regs.c (...) > +static void test_user_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool aarch64_only) > +{ > + uint64_t masks[KVM_ARM_FEATURE_ID_RANGE_SIZE]; > + struct reg_mask_range range = { > + .addr = (__u64)masks, > + }; > + int ret; > + > + /* KVM should return error when reserved field is not zero */ > + range.reserved[0] = 1; > + ret = __vm_ioctl(vcpu->vm, KVM_ARM_GET_REG_WRITABLE_MASKS, &range); > + TEST_ASSERT(ret, "KVM doesn't check invalid parameters."); I think the code should first check for KVM_CAP_ARM_SUPPORTED_REG_MASK_RANGES -- newer kselftests are supposed to be able to run on older kernels, and we should just skip all of this if the API isn't there. > + > + /* Get writable masks for feature ID registers */ > + memset(range.reserved, 0, sizeof(range.reserved)); > + vm_ioctl(vcpu->vm, KVM_ARM_GET_REG_WRITABLE_MASKS, &range);