From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] tools/kvm/9p: Simplify the handler Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:43:57 +0530 Message-ID: <87fwn61jze.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1308419348-31934-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1308419348-31934-5-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1308423094.3766.8.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: penberg@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Sasha Levin Return-path: Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:38985 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751197Ab1FSFOD (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Jun 2011 01:14:03 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p5J4qQmx026578 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:52:26 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p5J5E2Zl135542 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 01:14:02 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p5J5E1Xc023161 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:14:02 -0300 In-Reply-To: <1308423094.3766.8.camel@lappy> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:51:34 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 23:19 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V > > --- > > tools/kvm/include/net/9p/9p.h | 1 - > > tools/kvm/virtio/9p.c | 261 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-) > > After applying the patches (within a 9p mounted dir): > > # mkdir new_dir > # cp 10MB new_dir/ > cp: cannot create regular file `new_dir/10MB': No such file or directory > works fine here sh-2.05b# ls -al 10M -rwxr-xr-x 1 4294967294 4294967294 10485760 Jun 19 2011 10M sh-2.05b# mkdir new_dir sh-2.05b# cp 10M new_dir/ sh-2.05b# Can you check the before and after behaviour with the patch ? -aneesh