From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2014-04-15 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:26:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87ha5t3i3q.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> References: <87y4z7erst.fsf@elfo.mitica> <87tx9uenab.fsf@elfo.mitica> <87vbuasnfb.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <534D4858.9040302@suse.de> <87ob02a5vh.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: qemu list , KVM devel mailing list , "quintela\@redhat.com" To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64091 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998AbaDPG0k (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 02:26:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Alexander Graf's message of "Tue, 15 Apr 2014 23:34:39 +0200") Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Alexander Graf writes: >> Am 15.04.2014 um 18:56 schrieb Markus Armbruster : >> >> Alexander Graf writes: >> >>>> On 04/15/2014 04:00 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>>> Juan Quintela writes: >>>> >>>>> Juan Quintela wrote: >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, Juan. >>>>> As there are no topics, no call. >>>> Did we have a call anyway? IRC log looks like we did... >>> >>> Yes, we did. Whoever attended, please reply with things I mixed up or >>> forgot. >>> >>> Two topics: >> [...] >>> 2) -device for non-PCI devices >> >> Interesting stuff, hate to have missed it. >> >> Can we please ensure more useful advance notice than "monitor the IRC >> channel around call time"? Decide call / no call the night before would >> work nicely for me. > > I sent an email to the list earlier this werk as reply to the last > call, because there was no mail for this week's agenda yet. That's probably why Juan didn't pick it up. Explanation, not criticizing either of you. If we post the call's agenda the night before, there's time to correct omissions. I'm fine with late agenda changes. I really don't like last minute call / no call decisions.