From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm tools: Support virtio indirect buffers
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:50:11 +1030
Message-ID: <87hb1mtcdw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <1322502867-28812-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <CAOJsxLF_sco1sm1ezLnmLB6Yi16wPjoO+U1fdH+Uh-wuLvih8g@mail.gmail.com> <1322511443.3629.7.camel@lappy> <1322514321.3629.12.camel@lappy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:39076 "EHLO ozlabs.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753001Ab1LAAfI (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:35:08 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1322514321.3629.12.camel@lappy>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:05:21 +0200, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 22:17 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> btw, on an unrelated subject, I think that with this patch we've fully
> covered the virtio spec, and as far as I know it's the first userspace
> implementation which covers the entire spec :)

BTW, why did you bother implementing virtio-mmio?  It seems like
gratuitous bloat.  I hope you're not going the same way as qemu :(

Thanks,
Rusty.