From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:31:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilummznd.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220114095535.0f498707@redhat.com>
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:33:38 +0000
> Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> > On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 09:04:29 +0100
>> > Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
>> > >
>> > > > On 12/27/21 18:32, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> > > >>> Tweaked and queued nevertheless, thanks.
>> > > >> it seems this patch breaks VCPU hotplug, in scenario:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 1. hotunplug existing VCPU (QEMU stores VCPU file descriptor in parked cpus list)
>> > > >> 2. hotplug it again (unsuspecting QEMU reuses stored file descriptor when recreating VCPU)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> RHBZ:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028337#c11
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > The fix here would be (in QEMU) to not call KVM_SET_CPUID2 again.
>> > > > However, we need to work around it in KVM, and allow KVM_SET_CPUID2 if
>> > > > the data passed to the ioctl is the same that was set before.
>> > >
>> > > Are we sure the data is going to be *exactly* the same? In particular,
>> > > when using vCPU fds from the parked list, do we keep the same
>> > > APIC/x2APIC id when hotplugging? Or can we actually hotplug with a
>> > > different id?
>> >
>> > If I recall it right, it can be a different ID easily.
>>
>> No, it cannot. KVM doesn't provide a way for userspace to change the APIC ID of
>> a vCPU after the vCPU is created. x2APIC flat out disallows changing the APIC ID,
>> and unless there's magic I'm missing, apic_mmio_write() => kvm_lapic_reg_write()
>> is not reachable from userspace.
>>
>> The only way for userspace to set the APIC ID is to change vcpu->vcpu_id, and that
>> can only be done at KVM_VCPU_CREATE.
>>
>> So, reusing a parked vCPU for hotplug must reuse the same APIC ID. QEMU handles
>> this by stashing the vcpu_id, a.k.a. APIC ID, when parking a vCPU, and reuses a
>> parked vCPU if and only if it has the same APIC ID. And because QEMU derives the
>> APIC ID from topology, that means all the topology CPUID leafs must remain the
>> same, otherwise the guest is hosed because it will send IPIs to the wrong vCPUs.
>
> Indeed, I was wrong.
> I just checked all cpu unplug history in qemu. It was introduced in qemu-2.7
> and from the very beginning it did stash vcpu_id,
> so there is no old QEMU that would re-plug VCPU with different apic_id.
> Though tells us nothing about what other userspace implementations might do.
>
The genie is out of the bottle already, 5.16 is released with the change
(which was promissed for some time, KVM was complaining with
pr_warn_ratelimited()). I'd be brave and say that if QEMU doesn't need
it then nobody else does (out of curiosity, are there KVM VMMs besides
QEMU which support CPU hotplug out there?).
> However, a problem of failing KVM_SET_CPUID2 during VCPU re-plug
> is still there and re-plug will fail if KVM rejects repeated KVM_SET_CPUID2
> even if ioctl called with exactly the same CPUID leafs as the 1st call.
>
Assuming APIC id change doesn not need to be supported, I can send v2
here with an empty allowlist.
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-14 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 17:58 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Avoid KVM_SET_CPUID2 after KVM_RUN in hyperv_features test Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-26 12:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-27 17:32 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-02 17:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-03 8:04 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-03 9:40 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-03 12:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-05 8:17 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-05 9:12 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-05 9:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-05 10:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-07 9:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-07 18:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-11 8:00 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-12 13:58 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-12 18:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-13 9:27 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-13 14:28 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-13 14:36 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-13 14:41 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-13 14:59 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-13 16:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-13 16:30 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-13 22:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14 8:28 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-14 16:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14 8:55 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-14 9:31 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2022-01-14 11:22 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-14 12:25 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-14 17:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-17 9:55 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-17 11:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-17 13:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ilummznd.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).