From: "Marc Hartmayer" <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 0/3] s390x: small Makefile improvements
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 10:03:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzj3eryo.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D1RP1BC65XW5.NC0D2AFAL0TD@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:30 AM +1000, "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue Jun 4, 2024 at 9:59 PM AEST, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
>> The first patch is useful anyway, the third could be dropped to be consistent
>> with the other architectures.
>
> Interesting. Is this the reason for the warning on all the other
> archs?
Could be, but the .eh_frame and .eh_frame_hdr sections are sometimes
required, e.g for __builtin_return_address(n),…. Another fix would be to
specify the sections in the linker scripts explicitly - but I’ve to ask
whether this has other side effects…
> Maybe they should all use the same options and all remove the explicit
> PHDR specification?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
--
Kind regards / Beste Grüße
Marc Hartmayer
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt
Geschäftsführung: David Faller
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-05 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-04 11:59 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 0/3] s390x: small Makefile improvements Marc Hartmayer
2024-06-04 11:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 1/3] s390x/Makefile: snippets: Add separate target for the ELF snippets Marc Hartmayer
2024-06-05 1:21 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-05 7:32 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-07-26 10:01 ` Janosch Frank
2024-07-29 7:00 ` Janosch Frank
2024-07-29 7:41 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-06-04 11:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 2/3] s390x/Makefile: snippets: Avoid creation of .eh_frame and .eh_frame_hdr sections Marc Hartmayer
2024-06-04 11:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 3/3] Revert "s390x: Specify program headers with flags to avoid linker warnings" Marc Hartmayer
2024-06-04 12:04 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-06-05 1:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 0/3] s390x: small Makefile improvements Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-05 8:03 ` Marc Hartmayer [this message]
2024-07-26 8:31 ` Marc Hartmayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jzj3eryo.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox