From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C35B815E7E9; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:21:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713979308; cv=none; b=RKicyyrbbIai1k3toMXi26hMp8f1x/Iq++jodRf+ybFxuCtGXjIUHP1nMBiNR0Gdj1QU+C9kV/c8Yoz4XIJbMBIaEaPIEpJ4OTQhZ08SVUTPRiWq2ghYXiZh7ae7FiE7jOfgpYI1uxkOB0ZqSprftsxad5gzms+wXZ9SKVacY4M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713979308; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yWhj0o+HpJVDI3YWH2WAC02pq8ek+737Xwj6ZX/cwIk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kUKQduk3TpCjY5x6zavPc+ypkmsFShAQXxnVa4JlmAT+xOk7dzb0z2d/BS0oogWUvz4AdL9SiA+FTLrPqJZwI8Abymwr2piNCA5TPY37RFtKY3dk81I9VO4cTPiBehzeXZ7jmZzWeURZ/pj7jX45oFpf5TX/QiqyOi7uF2srjN4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=VDJ1ZkhP; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=6ivm7y17; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="VDJ1ZkhP"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="6ivm7y17" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1713979304; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GxtJ8OShK36uXTc4XHgLpeP8rPXbYQataNV1BNHE+3U=; b=VDJ1ZkhPCbolPa6U0BU7/iQfGsvWyWHQTFALWjSUIRFAhDjYdt7++U3sy1e2tzXlzTqd3h xoHq0AOfcOrCOqp/hiVhnK8NKJpWezD7EgZzG/h7XxmrPt7gBFTsCKsZaLo3jmz1GU4u39 X+PEh0h41PyAlwVSnzYxICLEBTd0ltJXPSXm+SxoVLFw+d+8L7Oxqwim62lKY0/QGapWaz gp94+cJts2jGJGEF5a83gL5fspWe732POGUBzc+IuXWv7O8AAiyEqZ0hsT9x0XSbnW1mjz RT2bodwaKz29Po54qnuLdxqM8Y5NavCYY+m7O/kcTzmGaLasjF4Skv5mnPC8tg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1713979304; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GxtJ8OShK36uXTc4XHgLpeP8rPXbYQataNV1BNHE+3U=; b=6ivm7y17CYzedN6WQ/3cjqsWR3bQhEbybD9eoP/9H813uVV+BZ5tdLljKX3+nrHf+8kSVq 1IDi4EGo59BBVpCw== To: Alex Williamson , Nipun Gupta Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, git@amd.com, harpreet.anand@amd.com, pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com, nikhil.agarwal@amd.com, michal.simek@amd.com, abhijit.gangurde@amd.com, srivatsa@csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] genirq/msi: add wrapper msi allocation API and export msi functions In-Reply-To: <20240423150920.12fe4a3e.alex.williamson@redhat.com> References: <20240423111021.1686144-1-nipun.gupta@amd.com> <20240423150920.12fe4a3e.alex.williamson@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:21:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87jzkmu164.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Apr 23 2024 at 15:09, Alex Williamson wrote: > I see in https://lore.kernel.org/all/87edbyfj0d.ffs@tglx/ that Thomas > also suggested a new subject: > > genirq/msi: Add MSI allocation helper and export MSI functions > > I'll address both of these on commit if there are no objections or > further comments. Patch 2/ looks ok to me now as well. Thanks, No objections from my side.